These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12079658)

  • 1. Sound improves visual discrimination learning in avian predators.
    Rowe C
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Jul; 269(1498):1353-7. PubMed ID: 12079658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aposematic colouration enhances memory formation in domestic chicks trained in a weak passive avoidance learning paradigm.
    Johnston AN; Burne TH
    Brain Res Bull; 2008 Jun; 76(3):313-6. PubMed ID: 18498948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Avian predators attack aposematic prey more forcefully when they are part of an aggregation.
    Skelhorn J; Ruxton GD
    Biol Lett; 2006 Dec; 2(4):488-90. PubMed ID: 17148269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fruit or aposematic insect? Context-dependent colour preferences in domestic chicks.
    Gamberale-Stille G; Tullberg BS
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Dec; 268(1485):2525-9. PubMed ID: 11749705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pyrazine odour makes visually conspicuous prey aversive.
    Lindström L; Rowe C; Guilford T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Jan; 268(1463):159-62. PubMed ID: 11209885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predator mixes and the conspicuousness of aposematic signals.
    Endler JA; Mappes J
    Am Nat; 2004 Apr; 163(4):532-47. PubMed ID: 15122501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of embryonic light stimulation on the ability to discriminate left from right in the domestic chick.
    Chiandetti C; Vallortigara G
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Mar; 198(1):240-6. PubMed ID: 19059286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning words' sounds before learning how words sound: 9-month-olds use distinct objects as cues to categorize speech information.
    Yeung HH; Werker JF
    Cognition; 2009 Nov; 113(2):234-43. PubMed ID: 19765698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chicks discriminate human gaze with their right hemisphere.
    Rosa Salva O; Regolin L; Vallortigara G
    Behav Brain Res; 2007 Feb; 177(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 17174412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Context-dependent prey avoidance in chicks persists following complete telencephalectomy.
    Zachar G; Schrott A; Kabai P
    Brain Res Bull; 2008 Jun; 76(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 18498943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of predators in maintaining the geographic organization of aposematic signals.
    Chouteau M; Angers B
    Am Nat; 2011 Dec; 178(6):810-7. PubMed ID: 22089874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Odour and colour as cues for taste-avoidance learning in domestic chicks.
    Roper TJ; Marples NM
    Anim Behav; 1997 Jun; 53(6):1241-50. PubMed ID: 9236020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Behavioral asymmetries in visual learning of young chickens.
    Vallortigara G
    Physiol Behav; 1989 Apr; 45(4):797-800. PubMed ID: 2780850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency-dependent taste-rejection by avian predation may select for defence chemical polymorphisms in aposematic prey.
    Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Biol Lett; 2005 Dec; 1(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 17148243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Avian learning favors colorful, not bright, signals.
    Lawrence JP; Noonan BP
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194279. PubMed ID: 29566013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of predator learning, forgetting, and recognition errors on the evolution of warning coloration.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2000 Jun; 54(3):751-63. PubMed ID: 10937250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Geographic mosaic of selection by avian predators on hindwing warning colour in a polymorphic aposematic moth.
    Rönkä K; Valkonen JK; Nokelainen O; Rojas B; Gordon S; Burdfield-Steel E; Mappes J
    Ecol Lett; 2020 Nov; 23(11):1654-1663. PubMed ID: 32881319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Weak and strong priming cues in bumblebee contextual learning.
    Dale K; Harland DP; Manning-Jones A; Collett TS
    J Exp Biol; 2005 Jan; 208(Pt 1):65-74. PubMed ID: 15601878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial relational learning and memory abilities do not differ between men and women in a real-world, open-field environment.
    Banta Lavenex P; Lavenex P
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Feb; 207(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 19800920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Body size matters for aposematic prey during predator aversion learning.
    Smith KE; Halpin CG; Rowe C
    Behav Processes; 2014 Nov; 109 Pt B():173-9. PubMed ID: 25256160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.