180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12080314)
1. Rigid versus wire fixation for mandibular advancement: skeletal and dental changes after 5 years.
Dolce C; Hatch JP; Van Sickels JE; Rugh JD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Jun; 121(6):610-9. PubMed ID: 12080314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study of skeletal and dental stability between rigid and wire fixation for mandibular advancement.
Keeling SD; Dolce C; Van Sickels JE; Bays RA; Clark GM; Rugh JD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):638-49. PubMed ID: 10842106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skeletal stability after mandibular advancement with rigid versus wire fixation.
Dolce C; Van Sickels JE; Bays RA; Rugh JD
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Nov; 58(11):1219-27; discussion 1227-8. PubMed ID: 11078132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stability of skeletal class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: rigid internal fixation versus wire osteosynthesis of the mandible.
Politi M; Costa F; Cian R; Polini F; Robiony M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Feb; 62(2):169-81. PubMed ID: 14762749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Five-year outcome and predictability of soft tissue profiles when wire or rigid fixation is used in mandibular advancement surgery.
Dolce C; Hatch JP; Van Sickels JE; Rugh JD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Sep; 124(3):249-56; quiz 340. PubMed ID: 12970658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maintenance of soft tissue changes after rigid versus wire fixation for mandibular advancement, with and without genioplasty.
Dolce C; Johnson PD; Van Sickels JE; Bays RA; Rugh JD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Aug; 92(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 11505259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mandibular range of motion after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with wire osteosynthesis or rigid fixation.
Hatch JP; Van Sickels JE; Rugh JD; Dolce C; Bays RA; Sakai S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 11250623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stability of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: rigid fixation versus transosseous wiring.
Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Bacchus SN; Kaczynski R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Oct; 118(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 11029735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Positional change of the hyoid bone after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with rigid and wire fixation.
Chung DH; Hatch JP; Dolce C; Van Sickels JE; Bays RA; Rugh JD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):382-9. PubMed ID: 11298311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dental or skeletal relapse after sagittal split osteotomy advancement surgery? Long-term follow-up.
Moen K; Wisth PJ; Skaale S; Bøe OE; Tornes K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 69(11):e461-8. PubMed ID: 21741141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.
Costa F; Robiony M; Sembronio S; Polini F; Politi M
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(3):179-92. PubMed ID: 12387609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of postoperative stability of three rigid internal fixation techniques after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement.
Sato FR; Asprino L; Fernandes Moreira RW; de Moraes M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e224-9. PubMed ID: 24103461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of skeletal stability after mandibular advancement and use of two rigid internal fixation techniques.
Blomqvist JE; Ahlborg G; Isaksson S; Svartz K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Jun; 55(6):568-74; discussion 574-5. PubMed ID: 9191638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Alteration of the mandibular plane during sagittal split advancement: short- and long-term stability.
Frey DR; Hatch JP; Van Sickels JE; Dolce C; Rugh JD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Aug; 104(2):160-9. PubMed ID: 17428696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement surgery with rigid internal fixation: a systematic review.
Joss CU; Vassalli IM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 67(2):301-13. PubMed ID: 19138603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Skeletal change at surgery as a predictor of long-term soft tissue profile change after mandibular advancement.
Keeling SD; LaBanc JP; Van Sickels JE; Bays RA; Cavalieros C; Rugh JD
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1996 Feb; 54(2):134-44; discussion 145-6. PubMed ID: 8604060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Technical factors accounting for stability of a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement: wire osteosynthesis versus rigid fixation.
Van Sickels JE; Dolce C; Keeling S; Tiner BD; Clark GM; Rugh JD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Jan; 89(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 10630936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short- and long-term skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement surgery.
Eggensperger N; Smolka K; Luder J; Iizuka T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 16344217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: titanium versus resorbable plates and screws for maxillary fixation.
Costa F; Robiony M; Zorzan E; Zerman N; Politi M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Apr; 64(4):642-51. PubMed ID: 16546644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Condylar position with rigid fixation versus wire osteosynthesis of a sagittal split advancement.
Van Sickels JE; Tiner BD; Keeling SD; Clark GM; Bays R; Rugh J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Jan; 57(1):31-4; discussion 35. PubMed ID: 9915392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
