These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12081346)

  • 1. Should routine ultrasonography in pregnancy be mandatory?
    Efetie ER; Umezulike AC; Ewuzie-Wokocha MN
    West Afr J Med; 2002; 21(1):56-8. PubMed ID: 12081346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Receipt of information and women's attitudes towards ultrasound scanning during pregnancy.
    Whynes DK
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jan; 19(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 11851962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How important is a cardiac echogenic focus in a routine fetal examination?
    Carriço A; Matias A; Areias JC
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2004 Mar; 23(3):459-61. PubMed ID: 15185567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why women want prenatal ultrasound in normal pregnancy.
    Gudex C; Nielsen BL; Madsen M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 16435312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The commodification of obstetric ultrasound scanning in Hanoi, Viet Nam.
    Gammeltoft T; Nguyen HT
    Reprod Health Matters; 2007 May; 15(29):163-71. PubMed ID: 17512387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Experiences of pregnant women with ultrasonic examination].
    Valbø A; Blaas HG
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1991 Jan; 111(3):320-1. PubMed ID: 2000612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early first trimester ultrasound examination. Is it really efficient in the clinical management of the pregnancy?
    Gezer A; Esen F; Erdem B; Mutlu H; Kahraman N; Ocak V
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2002 Dec; 267(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 12439551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester combined screening followed by second-trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected population.
    Rozenberg P; Bussières L; Chevret S; Bernard JP; Malagrida L; Cuckle H; Chabry C; Durand-Zaleski I; Bidat L; Lacroix I; Moulis M; Roger M; Jacquemot MC; Bault JP; Boukobza P; Boccara P; Vialard F; Giudicelli Y; Ville Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 195(5):1379-87. PubMed ID: 16723105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasound technology: the RADIUS (Routine Antenatal Diagnostic Imaging with Ultrasound) study & national policy.
    Huang L
    J Clin Eng; 1994; 19(4):297-309. PubMed ID: 10137111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison between acoustic output indices in 2D and 3D/4D ultrasound in obstetrics.
    Sheiner E; Hackmon R; Shoham-Vardi I; Pombar X; Hussey MJ; Strassner HT; Abramowicz JS
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 29(3):326-8. PubMed ID: 17265534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Second-trimester routine ultrasound screening: expectations and experiences in a nationwide Swedish sample.
    Georgsson Ohman S; Waldenström U
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jul; 32(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 18543374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychological impact of the detection of soft markers on routine ultrasound scanning: a pilot study investigating the modifying role of information.
    Watson MS; Hall S; Langford K; Marteau TM
    Prenat Diagn; 2002 Jul; 22(7):569-75. PubMed ID: 12124690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prenatal three-dimensional ultrasound: perception of sonographers, sonologists and undergraduate students.
    Lee S; Pretorius DH; Asfoor S; Hull AD; Newton RP; Hollenbach K; Nelson TR
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 30(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 17497645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evolution of indications for cesarean section between 1991 and 2000 in materials from the Pathology Clinic in the Department of Pregnancy and Labor, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin].
    Bilar M
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():173-92. PubMed ID: 15552847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester combined screening followed by second trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected population].
    Rozenberg P; Bussières L; Chevret S; Bernard JP; Malagrida L; Cuckle H; Chabry C; Durand-Zaleski I; Bidat L; Lacroix I; Moulis M; Roger M; Jacquemot MC; Bault JP; Boukobza P; Boccara P; Vialat F; Giudicelli Y; Ville Y
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Apr; 35(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 17350315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trends in prenatal ultrasound use in the United States: 1995 to 2006.
    Siddique J; Lauderdale DS; VanderWeele TJ; Lantos JD
    Med Care; 2009 Nov; 47(11):1129-35. PubMed ID: 19786915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of routine ultrasound scan in pre-termination of pregnancy assessment in community setting.
    Singh M; Porter C; Johnson L
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Jul; 28(5):508-10. PubMed ID: 18850425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ethics, an emerging subdiscipline of obstetric ultrasound, and its relevance to the routine obstetric scan.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jan; 1(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 12797097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parental expectations, experiences and reactions, sense of coherence and grade of anxiety related to routine ultrasound examination with normal findings during pregnancy.
    Ekelin M; Crang Svalenius E; Larsson AK; Nyberg P; Marsál K; Dykes AK
    Prenat Diagn; 2009 Oct; 29(10):952-9. PubMed ID: 19582763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prenatal ultrasound scanning and the risk of schizophrenia and other psychoses.
    Stålberg K; Haglund B; Axelsson O; Cnattingius S; Hultman CM; Kieler H
    Epidemiology; 2007 Sep; 18(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 17700245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.