107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12081346)
1. Should routine ultrasonography in pregnancy be mandatory?
Efetie ER; Umezulike AC; Ewuzie-Wokocha MN
West Afr J Med; 2002; 21(1):56-8. PubMed ID: 12081346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Receipt of information and women's attitudes towards ultrasound scanning during pregnancy.
Whynes DK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jan; 19(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 11851962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How important is a cardiac echogenic focus in a routine fetal examination?
Carriço A; Matias A; Areias JC
Rev Port Cardiol; 2004 Mar; 23(3):459-61. PubMed ID: 15185567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Why women want prenatal ultrasound in normal pregnancy.
Gudex C; Nielsen BL; Madsen M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 16435312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The commodification of obstetric ultrasound scanning in Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Gammeltoft T; Nguyen HT
Reprod Health Matters; 2007 May; 15(29):163-71. PubMed ID: 17512387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Experiences of pregnant women with ultrasonic examination].
Valbø A; Blaas HG
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1991 Jan; 111(3):320-1. PubMed ID: 2000612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early first trimester ultrasound examination. Is it really efficient in the clinical management of the pregnancy?
Gezer A; Esen F; Erdem B; Mutlu H; Kahraman N; Ocak V
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2002 Dec; 267(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 12439551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester combined screening followed by second-trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected population.
Rozenberg P; Bussières L; Chevret S; Bernard JP; Malagrida L; Cuckle H; Chabry C; Durand-Zaleski I; Bidat L; Lacroix I; Moulis M; Roger M; Jacquemot MC; Bault JP; Boukobza P; Boccara P; Vialard F; Giudicelli Y; Ville Y
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 195(5):1379-87. PubMed ID: 16723105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasound technology: the RADIUS (Routine Antenatal Diagnostic Imaging with Ultrasound) study & national policy.
Huang L
J Clin Eng; 1994; 19(4):297-309. PubMed ID: 10137111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison between acoustic output indices in 2D and 3D/4D ultrasound in obstetrics.
Sheiner E; Hackmon R; Shoham-Vardi I; Pombar X; Hussey MJ; Strassner HT; Abramowicz JS
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 29(3):326-8. PubMed ID: 17265534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Second-trimester routine ultrasound screening: expectations and experiences in a nationwide Swedish sample.
Georgsson Ohman S; Waldenström U
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jul; 32(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 18543374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychological impact of the detection of soft markers on routine ultrasound scanning: a pilot study investigating the modifying role of information.
Watson MS; Hall S; Langford K; Marteau TM
Prenat Diagn; 2002 Jul; 22(7):569-75. PubMed ID: 12124690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prenatal three-dimensional ultrasound: perception of sonographers, sonologists and undergraduate students.
Lee S; Pretorius DH; Asfoor S; Hull AD; Newton RP; Hollenbach K; Nelson TR
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 30(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 17497645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evolution of indications for cesarean section between 1991 and 2000 in materials from the Pathology Clinic in the Department of Pregnancy and Labor, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin].
Bilar M
Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():173-92. PubMed ID: 15552847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester combined screening followed by second trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected population].
Rozenberg P; Bussières L; Chevret S; Bernard JP; Malagrida L; Cuckle H; Chabry C; Durand-Zaleski I; Bidat L; Lacroix I; Moulis M; Roger M; Jacquemot MC; Bault JP; Boukobza P; Boccara P; Vialat F; Giudicelli Y; Ville Y
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Apr; 35(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 17350315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trends in prenatal ultrasound use in the United States: 1995 to 2006.
Siddique J; Lauderdale DS; VanderWeele TJ; Lantos JD
Med Care; 2009 Nov; 47(11):1129-35. PubMed ID: 19786915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of routine ultrasound scan in pre-termination of pregnancy assessment in community setting.
Singh M; Porter C; Johnson L
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Jul; 28(5):508-10. PubMed ID: 18850425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethics, an emerging subdiscipline of obstetric ultrasound, and its relevance to the routine obstetric scan.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jan; 1(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 12797097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parental expectations, experiences and reactions, sense of coherence and grade of anxiety related to routine ultrasound examination with normal findings during pregnancy.
Ekelin M; Crang Svalenius E; Larsson AK; Nyberg P; Marsál K; Dykes AK
Prenat Diagn; 2009 Oct; 29(10):952-9. PubMed ID: 19582763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prenatal ultrasound scanning and the risk of schizophrenia and other psychoses.
Stålberg K; Haglund B; Axelsson O; Cnattingius S; Hultman CM; Kieler H
Epidemiology; 2007 Sep; 18(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 17700245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
