These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12081393)

  • 21. Coreference processing and levels of analysis in object-relative constructions; demonstration of antecedent reactivation with the cross-modal priming paradigm.
    Love T; Swinney D
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1996 Jan; 25(1):5-24. PubMed ID: 8789365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Metaphors and the mental lexicon.
    Geiger O; Ward LM
    Brain Lang; 1999 Jun 1-15; 68(1-2):192-8. PubMed ID: 10433758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tolerating ambiguity: ambiguous words recruit the left inferior frontal gyrus in absence of a behavioral effect.
    Hargreaves IS; Pexman PM; Pittman DJ; Goodyear BG
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 20382629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Semantic involvement in the lexical and sentence processing of Japanese kanji.
    Morita A; Tamaoka K
    Brain Lang; 2002 Jul; 82(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 12174815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sentential and discourse topic effects on lexical ambiguity processing: an eye movement examination.
    Binder KS
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Jul; 31(5):690-702. PubMed ID: 12956234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Event-related potential evidence for the early activation of literal meaning during comprehension of conventional lexical metaphors.
    Lu A; Zhang JX
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(8):1730-8. PubMed ID: 22561889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How Polysemy Affects Concreteness Ratings: The Case of Metaphor.
    Reijnierse WG; Burgers C; Bolognesi M; Krennmayr T
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Aug; 43(8):e12779. PubMed ID: 31446656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of clausal structure and word frequency in sentence processing.
    Dunlap GL; Hurtig RR
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1981 May; 10(3):313-26. PubMed ID: 7277261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ambiguity advantage revisited: two meanings are better than one when accessing Chinese nouns.
    Lin CJ; Ahrens K
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2010 Feb; 39(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 19582583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Processing and Representation of German -n Plurals: A Dual Mechanism Approach.
    Sonnenstuhl I; Huth A
    Brain Lang; 2002; 81(1-3):276-90. PubMed ID: 12081399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pathways to lexical ambiguity: fMRI evidence for bilateral fronto-parietal involvement in language processing.
    Klepousniotou E; Gracco VL; Pike GB
    Brain Lang; 2014 Apr; 131():56-64. PubMed ID: 24183467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access.
    Marslen-Wilson W; Moss HE; van Halen S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Dec; 22(6):1376-92. PubMed ID: 8953227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Probing Lexical Ambiguity: Word Vectors Encode Number and Relatedness of Senses.
    Beekhuizen B; Armstrong BC; Stevenson S
    Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 45(5):e12943. PubMed ID: 34018227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is the time course of lexical activation and competition in spoken word recognition affected by adult aging? An event-related potential (ERP) study.
    Hunter CR
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Oct; 91():451-464. PubMed ID: 27616158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An investigation of lexical ambiguity in Broca's aphasics using an auditory lexical priming technique.
    Katz WF
    Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(5):747-52. PubMed ID: 3211293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lexical and sublexical processes in the perception of transposed-letter anagrams.
    Frankish C; Barnes L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):381-91. PubMed ID: 17935005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Semantic neighborhood effects on the recognition of ambiguous words.
    Locker L; Simpson GB; Yates M
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Jun; 31(4):505-15. PubMed ID: 12872867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The relatedness-of-meaning effect for ambiguous words in lexical-decision tasks: when does relatedness matter?
    Hino Y; Kusunose Y; Lupker SJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Sep; 64(3):180-96. PubMed ID: 20873915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impairments of lexical-semantic processing in aphasia: evidence from the processing of lexical ambiguities.
    Hagoort P
    Brain Lang; 1993 Aug; 45(2):189-232. PubMed ID: 8358597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Polysemy and the subjective lexicon: semantic relatedness and the salience of intraword senses.
    Durkin K; Manning J
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1989 Nov; 18(6):577-612. PubMed ID: 2632800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.