These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12081426)

  • 21. Homophone effects in lexical decision.
    Pexman PM; Lupker SJ; Jared D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jan; 27(1):139-56. PubMed ID: 11204094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reading speech and hearing print: constraining models of visual word recognition by exploring connections with speech perception.
    Borowsky R; Owen WJ; Fonos N
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1999 Dec; 53(4):294-305. PubMed ID: 10646201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Homographic and heterographic homophones in speech production: does orthography matter?
    Biedermann B; Nickels L
    Cortex; 2008 Jun; 44(6):683-97. PubMed ID: 18472038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Phonological variant recognition: representations and rules.
    Pinnow E; Connine CM
    Lang Speech; 2014 Mar; 57(Pt 1):42-67. PubMed ID: 24754220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Phonological effects in visual word recognition: investigating the impact of feedback activation.
    Pexman PM; Lupker SJ; Reggin LD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 May; 28(3):572-84. PubMed ID: 12018509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Orthographic transparency and grapheme-phoneme conversion: An ERP study in Arabic and French readers.
    Simon G; Bernard C; Lalonde R; Rebaï M
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):141-52. PubMed ID: 16822485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The KEY to the ROCK: near-homophony in nonnative visual word recognition.
    Ota M; Hartsuiker RJ; Haywood SL
    Cognition; 2009 May; 111(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 19230869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Acquisition of Malay word recognition skills: lessons from low-progress early readers.
    Lee LW; Wheldall K
    Dyslexia; 2011 Feb; 17(1):19-37. PubMed ID: 21241030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual, orthographic, phonological, and lexical influences in reading.
    Massaro DW; Cohen MM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Dec; 20(6):1107-28. PubMed ID: 7844509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparative quantitative analysis of Greek orthographic transparency.
    Protopapas A; Vlahou EL
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):991-1008. PubMed ID: 19897808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Poor readers' use of orthographic information in learning to read new words: a visual bias or a phonological deficit?
    McNeil AM; Johnston RS
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Apr; 36(3):629-40. PubMed ID: 18491502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ambiguity and visual word recognition: can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects?
    Pexman PM; Lupker SJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1999 Dec; 53(4):323-34. PubMed ID: 10646204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sentence reading: do we make use of orthographic cues in homophones?
    Brysbaert M; Grondelaers S; Ratinckx E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2000 Sep; 105(1):31-56. PubMed ID: 11057001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Transcoding sound to spelling: single or multiple sound unit correspondence?
    Baxter DM; Warrington EK
    Cortex; 1987 Mar; 23(1):11-28. PubMed ID: 3568699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How the clustering of phonological neighbors affects visual word recognition.
    Yates M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1649-56. PubMed ID: 23565783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Grapheme-phoneme processing of single words.
    Walter N; Cliche S; Joubert S; Beauregard M; Joanette Y
    Brain Cogn; 2001; 46(1-2):295-9. PubMed ID: 11527353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does visual word identification involve a sub-phonemic level?
    Lukatela G; Eaton T; Lee C; Turvey MT
    Cognition; 2001 Mar; 78(3):B41-52. PubMed ID: 11124354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Experimental induction of reading difficulties in normal readers provides novel insights into the neurofunctional mechanisms of visual word recognition.
    Heim S; Weidner R; von Overheidt AC; Tholen N; Grande M; Amunts K
    Brain Struct Funct; 2014 Mar; 219(2):461-71. PubMed ID: 23400699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Lexique-Infra: grapheme-phoneme, phoneme-grapheme regularity, consistency, and other sublexical statistics for 137,717 polysyllabic French words.
    Gimenes M; Perret C; New B
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Dec; 52(6):2480-2488. PubMed ID: 32441034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Graphemes are perceptual reading units.
    Rey A; Ziegler JC; Jacobs AM
    Cognition; 2000 Apr; 75(1):B1-12. PubMed ID: 10815779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.