These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12081672)

  • 1. Microprocessor-controlled local anesthesia versus the conventional syringe technique in hair transplantation.
    True RH; Fabfp ; Abhrs ; Elliott RM; Abhrs
    Dermatol Surg; 2002 Jun; 28(6):463-8. PubMed ID: 12081672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pain associated with local anesthetic injection in eyelid procedures: Comparison of microprocessor-controlled versus traditional syringe techniques.
    Lee EW; Tucker NA
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007; 23(1):37-8. PubMed ID: 17237688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microprocessor-controlled local anesthesia versus the conventional syringe technique in hair transplantation.
    Whalen K; Rabinovitz HS; Oliviero MC
    Dermatol Surg; 2003 Jan; 29(1):113; discussion 113-4. PubMed ID: 12534526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The WAND local anesthetic delivery system: a more pleasant experience for anal anesthesia.
    Tan PY; Vukasin P; Chin ID; Ciona CJ; Ortega AE; Anthone GJ; Corman ML; Beart RW
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2001 May; 44(5):686-9. PubMed ID: 11376545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microprocessor-controlled local anesthesia vs. the conventional syringe technique in hair transplantation.
    Stough DB
    Dermatol Surg; 2002 Jul; 28(7):xvi. PubMed ID: 12135502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pain Experience and Behavior Management in Pediatric Dentistry: A Comparison between Traditional Local Anesthesia and the Wand Computerized Delivery System.
    Garret-Bernardin A; Cantile T; D'Antò V; Galanakis A; Fauxpoint G; Ferrazzano GF; De Rosa S; Vallogini G; Romeo U; Galeotti A
    Pain Res Manag; 2017; 2017():7941238. PubMed ID: 28293129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Injection pain and postinjection pain of the anterior middle superior alveolar injection administered with the Wand or conventional syringe.
    Nusstein J; Lee S; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Jul; 98(1):124-31. PubMed ID: 15243483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computerized local anesthetic delivery vs. traditional syringe technique. Subjective pain response.
    Hochman M; Chiarello D; Hochman CB; Lopatkin R; Pergola S
    N Y State Dent J; 1997; 63(7):24-9. PubMed ID: 9297957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The assessment of pain sensation during local anesthesia using a computerized local anesthesia (Wand) and a conventional syringe.
    Ram D; Peretz B
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(2):130-3. PubMed ID: 14528773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Wand vs. traditional injection: a comparison of pain related behaviors.
    Gibson RS; Allen K; Hutfless S; Beiraghi S
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(6):458-62. PubMed ID: 11132503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the pain levels of computer-controlled and conventional anesthesia techniques in prosthodontic treatment.
    Yenisey M
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2009; 17(5):414-20. PubMed ID: 19936518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The wand in pulp therapy: an alternative to inferior alveolar nerve block.
    Oztaş N; Ulusu T; Bodur H; Doğan C
    Quintessence Int; 2005; 36(7-8):559-64. PubMed ID: 15997937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison of the systems used for providing local anesthesia in dentistry--the Wand (Milestone Scientific) and Injex (Rosch)].
    Zarzecka J; Gończowski K; Kesek B; Darczuk D; Zapała J
    Przegl Lek; 2006; 63(12):1304-9. PubMed ID: 17642145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single tooth anesthesia versus conventional anesthesia: a cross-over study.
    Campanella V; Libonati A; Nardi R; Angotti V; Gallusi G; Montemurro E; D'Amario M; Marzo G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec; 22(9):3205-3213. PubMed ID: 29525923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pain behaviour and distress in children during two sequential dental visits: comparing a computerised anaesthesia delivery system and a traditional syringe.
    Versloot J; Veerkamp JS; Hoogstraten J
    Br Dent J; 2008 Jul; 205(1):E2; discussion 30-1. PubMed ID: 18493254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the Wand with a conventional technique.
    Sumer M; Misir F; Koyuturk AE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):e106-9. PubMed ID: 16731373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pain perception during inferior alveolar injection administered with the Wand or conventional syringe.
    Yesilyurt C; Bulut G; Taşdemir T
    Br Dent J; 2008 Sep; 205(5):E10; discussion 258-9. PubMed ID: 18791585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the pain reaction of children receiving periodontal ligament anesthesia using a computerized device (Wand).
    Ran D; Peretz B
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2003; 27(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 12739685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pain perception and utility: a comparison of the syringe and computerized local injection techniques.
    Nicholson JW; Berry TG; Summitt JB; Yuan CH; Witten TM
    Gen Dent; 2001; 49(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 12004696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    Chenchugopal M; Mungara J; Venumbaka NR; Elangovan A; Vijayakumar P; Rajendran S
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2017; 8(2):315-320. PubMed ID: 28839421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.