These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention. Riga PJ Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: substituted judgment, informed consent, and the Quinlan decision. Sargeant KJ Gonzaga Law Rev; 1978; 13(3):781-811. PubMed ID: 11664980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Tragedies and medical choices. Lammers SE Christ Century; 1993 Sep 8-15; 110(25):845-6. PubMed ID: 11660055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. In the Matter of Karen Quinlan. 31 Mar 1976. New Jersey. Supreme Court Atl Report; 1976; 355():647-72. PubMed ID: 11646053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Whatever happened to the Danville Siamese twins? Steinbock B Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Aug; 17(4):3-4. PubMed ID: 11653782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Criminal law--homicide--removal of intravenous feeding line from vegetative, comatose patient at family's request is not murder. Barber v. Superior Court, 147 Cal. App. 3d 1006, 195 Cal. Rptr. 484 (1983). Crook RR Cumberland Law Rev; 1984-1985; 15(1):225-37. PubMed ID: 11652439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Velez v. Bethune. Georgia. Court of Appeals Wests South East Report; 1995 Dec; 466():627-35. PubMed ID: 12041303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. If this baby could choose. Meilaender G Linacre Q; 1982 Nov; 49(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 11649599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Euthanasia, the right to die and privacy: observations on some recent cases. Riga PJ Linc Law Rev; 1980; 11(2):109-65. PubMed ID: 11658630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. I.V. withdrawal: the severance of medicine's or society's umbilical cord? Barber v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 137 Cal.App.3d 1006, 195 Cal.Rptr. 484 (1983). Chrisman JP Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):941-72. PubMed ID: 11652480 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Life or death for infants: doctors consult parents of defective children. Colen BD Washington Post; 1974 Mar; ():A1+. PubMed ID: 11649105 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The plight of the genetically handicapped newborn: a comparative analysis. Smith GP Holdsworth Law Rev; 1984; 9(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 12091924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Withholding lifesaving treatment from defective newborns: an equal protection analysis. Wood AT St Louis Univ Law J; 1985; 29(3):853-79. PubMed ID: 11649209 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Nat Hentoff on the babies Doe. McFadden JP; Hentoff N Hum Life Rev; 1984; 10(2):73-104. PubMed ID: 11651744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Nutritional discontinuation: active or passive euthanasia? Banja JD J Neurosurg Nurs; 1990 Apr; 22(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 11659424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Comments arising from Court of Appeal decision on baby with Down's syndrome. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1981 Aug; 283(6290):567. PubMed ID: 11658256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. "Euthanasia, Aiding Suicide and Cessation of Treatment": a critique. Williams JR Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1984 Nov; 17(7):589-91. PubMed ID: 11651758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Re B (A Minor) (Wardship: Medical Treatment). Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division All Engl Law Rep; 1981 Aug; [1990] 3():927-30. PubMed ID: 11648312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]