648 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12083089)
1. Constitutionally guaranteed rights of the mentally ill.
Cazalas M
South Univ Law Rev; 1975; 2(1):9-38. PubMed ID: 12083089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Developments in the law: civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Harv Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 87(6):1190-406. PubMed ID: 11664523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Institutionalizing the rights of mental patients: committing the legislature.
Morris GH
Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):957-1024. PubMed ID: 11663464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Minnesota Commitment Act of 1982: summary and analysis.
Janus ES; Wolfson RM
Hamline Law Rev; 1983 Feb; 6(1):41-94. PubMed ID: 11658497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.
Roth LH
Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Stromberg CD; Stone AA
Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Revising Pennsylvania's involuntary civil commitment statute.
Vater JA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1975; 37(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 11664513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
Belzer I
UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Legal problems involved in implementing the right to treatment.
Morris GH
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1973 Jan; 1(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 11664496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Civil rights and the mentally ill: revolution in bedlam.
Offir CW
Psychol Today; 1974 Oct; 8(5):60-62+. PubMed ID: 11664431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Civil commitment of the mentally ill in California: the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act.
Hart MA
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1974 Feb; 7(1):93-136. PubMed ID: 11664312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychiatric hospitalization and the Constitution: some observation on emerging trends.
Reisner R
Univ Ill Law Forum; 1973; 1973(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 11664295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. If civil commitment is the answer for children, what are the questions?
Zenoff EH; Zients AB
George Washington Law Rev; 1983 Jan; 51(2):171-218. PubMed ID: 11658670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Civil commitment in Alabama.
Segall RD
Ala Law Rev; 1977; 26(1):215-71. PubMed ID: 11664721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In search of a sane commitment statute.
Treffert DA; Krajeck RW
Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):56-57+. PubMed ID: 11662296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The 1983 revision of the Texas mental health code.
Dix GE
St Marys Law J; 1984; 16(1):41-153. PubMed ID: 11658786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. An overview of state involuntary civil commitment statutes.
Van Duizend R; McGraw BD; Keilitz I
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(3):328-35. PubMed ID: 11658581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Pennsylvania's new Mental Health Procedures Act: due process and the right to treatment for the mentally ill.
Lundeen PA
Dickinson Law Rev; 1977; 81(3):627-47. PubMed ID: 11664828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Civil commitment and the right to treatment.
Kelly DS
LA Law Rev; 1975; 35(2):563-9. PubMed ID: 11664468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
