These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
643 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12083089)
1. Constitutionally guaranteed rights of the mentally ill. Cazalas M South Univ Law Rev; 1975; 2(1):9-38. PubMed ID: 12083089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Developments in the law: civil commitment of the mentally ill. Harv Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 87(6):1190-406. PubMed ID: 11664523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Institutionalizing the rights of mental patients: committing the legislature. Morris GH Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):957-1024. PubMed ID: 11663464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Minnesota Commitment Act of 1982: summary and analysis. Janus ES; Wolfson RM Hamline Law Rev; 1983 Feb; 6(1):41-94. PubMed ID: 11658497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment. Roth LH Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill. Stromberg CD; Stone AA Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Revising Pennsylvania's involuntary civil commitment statute. Vater JA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1975; 37(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 11664513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients. Belzer I UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Legal problems involved in implementing the right to treatment. Morris GH Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1973 Jan; 1(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 11664496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Civil rights and the mentally ill: revolution in bedlam. Offir CW Psychol Today; 1974 Oct; 8(5):60-62+. PubMed ID: 11664431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Civil commitment of the mentally ill in California: the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act. Hart MA Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1974 Feb; 7(1):93-136. PubMed ID: 11664312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychiatric hospitalization and the Constitution: some observation on emerging trends. Reisner R Univ Ill Law Forum; 1973; 1973(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 11664295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. If civil commitment is the answer for children, what are the questions? Zenoff EH; Zients AB George Washington Law Rev; 1983 Jan; 51(2):171-218. PubMed ID: 11658670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Civil commitment in Alabama. Segall RD Ala Law Rev; 1977; 26(1):215-71. PubMed ID: 11664721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In search of a sane commitment statute. Treffert DA; Krajeck RW Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):56-57+. PubMed ID: 11662296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question. Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The 1983 revision of the Texas mental health code. Dix GE St Marys Law J; 1984; 16(1):41-153. PubMed ID: 11658786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. An overview of state involuntary civil commitment statutes. Van Duizend R; McGraw BD; Keilitz I Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(3):328-35. PubMed ID: 11658581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Pennsylvania's new Mental Health Procedures Act: due process and the right to treatment for the mentally ill. Lundeen PA Dickinson Law Rev; 1977; 81(3):627-47. PubMed ID: 11664828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Civil commitment and the right to treatment. Kelly DS LA Law Rev; 1975; 35(2):563-9. PubMed ID: 11664468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]