These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Biotechnology and culture: the impact of public debates on government regulation in the United States and Denmark. Baark E; Jamison A Technol Soc; 1990; 12(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 11650912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Playing God with DNA. Lubow A New Times; 1977 Jan; 8(1):48-49+. PubMed ID: 11661390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The regulation of recombinant DNA research: the alternative of local control. Rosenblatt DP Boston Coll Environ Aff Law Rev; 1982; 10(1):37-78. PubMed ID: 11649694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Science that frightens scientists: the great debate over DNA. Bennett W; Gurin J Atl Mon (1971); 1977 Feb; 237(2):43-50+. PubMed ID: 11661393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Recombinant DNA and the regulation of biotechnology: reflections on the Asilomar Conference, ten years after. Barkstrom JE Akron Law Rev; 1985; 19(1):81-126. PubMed ID: 11650740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Risks and benefits, rights and responsibilities: a history of the recombinant DNA research controversy. Swazey JP; Sorenson JR; Wong CB South Calif Law Rev; 1978 Sep; 51(6):1019-78. PubMed ID: 11661650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientists and the control of science. Singer M New Sci; 1977 Jun; 74(1056):631-4. PubMed ID: 11663771 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Recombinant DNA: a case study in regulation of scientific research. Chalfant JC; Hartmann ME; Blakeboro A Ecol Law Q; 1979; 8(1):55-129. PubMed ID: 11665069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. State biotechnology oversight: the juncture of technology, law, and public policy. Vito CC Maine Law Rev; 1993; 45(2):329-83. PubMed ID: 11652701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Recombinant DNA and technology assessment. Georgetown Law J; 1977; 11(4):785-878. PubMed ID: 11664859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A case analysis of NEPA implementation: NIH and DNA recombinant research. Chalker SM; Catz RS Duke Law J; 1978 Mar; 1978(1):57-112. PubMed ID: 11661621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Recombinant DNA: guidelines debated at public hearing. Wade N Science; 1976 Feb; 191(4229):834-6. PubMed ID: 11643300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The DNA maelstrom. McCann NL Sojourners; 1977 May; 6(5):23-6. PubMed ID: 11662888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Biotech's stalled revolution. Schneider K N Y Times Mag; 1986 Nov; ():42-44, 47-48+. PubMed ID: 11649783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetics and the common man. Norman C Technol Rev; 1976 Feb; 78(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 11662522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of biotechnology on corporate law and regulation. Green HP Technol Soc; 1983; 5(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 11650687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Should science be stopped? The case of recombinant DNA research. Gershon ES Public Interest; 1983; No. 71():3-16. PubMed ID: 11650689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Molecular biology or molecular politics? The production of scientific consensus on the hazards of recombinant DNA technology. Wright S Soc Stud Sci; 1986 Nov; 16(4):593-620. PubMed ID: 11650809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]