These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12083209)

  • 1. One source for distortion product otoacoustic emissions generated by low- and high-level primaries.
    Lukashkin AN; Lukashkina VA; Russell IJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2740-8. PubMed ID: 12083209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cochlear compression estimates from measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Neely ST; Gorga MP; Dorn PA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1499-507. PubMed ID: 14514203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physiopathological significance of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions at 2f1-f2 produced by high- versus low-level stimuli.
    Avan P; Bonfils P; Gilain L; Mom T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):430-41. PubMed ID: 12558280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit. II: Differential physiological vulnerability.
    Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Nov; 92(5):2662-82. PubMed ID: 1479129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Otoacoustic emissions without somatic motility: can stereocilia mechanics drive the mammalian cochlea?
    Liberman MC; Zuo J; Guinan JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Sep; 116(3):1649-55. PubMed ID: 15478431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modifications of a single saturating non-linearity account for post-onset changes in 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission.
    Lukashkin AN; Russell IJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Oct; 112(4):1561-8. PubMed ID: 12398462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and basilar membrane vibration in the 6-9 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae.
    Rhode WS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2725-37. PubMed ID: 18189565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transient-evoked stimulus-frequency and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired ears.
    Konrad-Martin D; Keefe DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jun; 117(6):3799-815. PubMed ID: 16018483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cochlear compression: effects of low-frequency biasing on quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emission.
    Bian L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3559-71. PubMed ID: 15658707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
    Lai J; Bartlett EL
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions measured at high frequencies in humans.
    Dreisbach LE; Siegel JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2456-69. PubMed ID: 11757935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Use of acoustic distortion products in clinical diagnosis. The site of origin of otoacoustic emissions in the inner ear].
    Plinkert PK; Harris FP; Probst R
    HNO; 1993 Jul; 41(7):339-44. PubMed ID: 8376180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold.
    Pienkowski M; Kunov H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Apr; 109(4):1496-502. PubMed ID: 11325121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How does the inner ear generate distortion product otoacoustic emissions?. Results from a realistic model of the human cochlea.
    Vetesnik A; Nobili R; Gummer A
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2006; 68(6):347-52. PubMed ID: 17065828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling DPOAE input/output function compression: comparisons with hearing thresholds.
    Bhagat SP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Sep; 25(8):746-59. PubMed ID: 25380121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring distortion product otoacoustic emissions using continuously sweeping primaries.
    Long GR; Talmadge CL; Lee J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1613-26. PubMed ID: 19045653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Level dependence of the nonlinear-distortion component of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Zelle D; Thiericke JP; Dalhoff E; Gummer AW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3475-90. PubMed ID: 26723305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence of upward spread of suppression in DPOAE measurements.
    Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dorn PA; Dierking D; Cyr E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):2910-20. PubMed ID: 12509012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In search of basal distortion product generators.
    Withnell RH; Lodde J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2116-23. PubMed ID: 17069309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.