165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12083721)
1. A multifrequency method for determining cochlear efferent activity.
Luebke AE; Foster PK; Stagner BB
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2002 Mar; 3(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 12083721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions predicts susceptibility to acoustic over-exposure in alert rabbits.
Luebke AE; Stagner BB; Martin GK; Lonsbury-Martin BL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):1941-9. PubMed ID: 25234992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of anesthesia on efferent-mediated adaptation of the DPOAE.
Boyev KP; Liberman MC; Brown MC
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2002 Sep; 3(3):362-73. PubMed ID: 12382109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Suppression and enhancement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions by interference tones above f(2). I. Basic findings in rabbits.
Martin GK; Stagner BB; Jassir D; Telischi FF; Lonsbury-Martin BL
Hear Res; 1999 Oct; 136(1-2):105-23. PubMed ID: 10511630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medial olivocochlear efferent activity in awake guinea pigs.
Guitton MJ; Avan P; Puel JL; Bonfils P
Neuroreport; 2004 Jun; 15(9):1379-82. PubMed ID: 15194856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
Moulin A; Collet L; Duclaux R
Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term sound conditioning increases distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitudes and decreases olivocochlear efferent reflex strength.
Peng JH; Tao ZZ; Huang ZW
Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(11):1167-70. PubMed ID: 17589320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Time-varying alterations in the f2-f1 DPOAE response to continuous primary stimulation. I: Response characterization and contribution of the olivocochlear efferents.
Kujawa SG; Fallon M; Bobbin RP
Hear Res; 1995 May; 85(1-2):142-54. PubMed ID: 7559170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Slow build-up of cochlear suppression during sustained contralateral noise: central modulation of olivocochlear efferents?
Larsen E; Liberman MC
Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 256(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 19232534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efferent modulation of pre-neural and neural distortion products.
Smith SB; Ichiba K; Velenovsky DS; Cone B
Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 356():25-34. PubMed ID: 29122423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of olivocochlear bundle section on otoacoustic emissions in humans: efferent effects in comparison with control subjects.
Williams EA; Brookes GB; Prasher DK
Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Mar; 114(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 8203191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise.
Büki B; Wit HP; Avan P
Brain Res; 2000 Jan; 852(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 10661505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Olivocochlear reflex assays: effects of contralateral sound on compound action potentials versus ear-canal distortion products.
Puria S; Guinan JJ; Liberman MC
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jan; 99(1):500-7. PubMed ID: 8568037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of occupational noise on pure-tone threshold and distortion product otoacoustic emissions after one workday.
Müller J; Janssen T
Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 246(1-2):9-22. PubMed ID: 18848612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) on acoustic distortion product input/output functions: does the medial efferent system act differently in the vicinity of an SOAE?
Moulin A; Collet L; Morgon A
Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 1604981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Slow variation of the amplitude of acoustic distortion at f2-f1 in awake rabbits.
Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
Hear Res; 1991 Feb; 51(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 2032963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement of medial olivocochlear efferent activity in humans: comparison of different distortion product otoacoustic emission-based paradigms.
Wagner W; Heyd A
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Oct; 32(8):1379-88. PubMed ID: 21921859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Olivocochlear reflex effect on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions is largest at frequencies with distinct fine structure dips.
Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Müller J; Janssen T; Zenner HP
Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):83-92. PubMed ID: 17137736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The behaviour of the f2-f1 acoustic distortion product: lack of effect of brainstem lesions in anaesthetized guinea pigs.
Lowe M; Robertson D
Hear Res; 1995 Mar; 83(1-2):133-41. PubMed ID: 7607979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of crossed olivocochlear bundle section on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
Kakigi A; Hirakawa H; Mount RJ; Harrison RV
Hear Res; 1997 Aug; 110(1-2):34-8. PubMed ID: 9282887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
