BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12084745)

  • 1. Use of high spatial resolution perimetry to identify scotomata not apparent with conventional perimetry in the nasal field of glaucomatous subjects.
    Westcott MC; Garway-Heath DF; Fitzke FW; Kamal D; Hitchings RA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2002 Jul; 86(7):761-6. PubMed ID: 12084745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High spatial resolution automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Westcott MC; McNaught AI; Crabb DP; Fitzke FW; Hitchings RA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1997 Jun; 81(6):452-9. PubMed ID: 9274408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of hemifield sector analysis protocol in multifocal visual evoked potential objective perimetry for the diagnosis and early detection of glaucomatous field defects.
    Mousa MF; Cubbidge RP; Al-Mansouri F; Bener A
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 24511212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is visual field evaluation using multiple correlations and linear regressions useful? An evaluation of Delphi perimetry.
    Wishart PK; Wardrop DR; Kosmin AS
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1998 Jul; 236(7):493-500. PubMed ID: 9672794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of cataract surgery on automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma.
    Hayashi K; Hayashi H; Nakao F; Hayashi F
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jul; 132(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 11438052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss.
    Goldberg I; Graham SL; Klistorner AI
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Jan; 133(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11755837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of VEP perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Bengtsson B
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2002 Dec; 80(6):620-6. PubMed ID: 12485283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peristat: a computer-based perimetry self-test for cost-effective population screening of glaucoma.
    Ianchulev T; Pham P; Makarov V; Francis B; Minckler D
    Curr Eye Res; 2005 Jan; 30(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15875358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of future scotoma on conventional automated static perimetry using frequency doubling technology perimetry.
    Kogure S; Toda Y; Tsukahara S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 90(3):347-52. PubMed ID: 16488960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Agreement between frequency doubling perimetry and static perimetry in eyes with high tension glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma.
    Kogure S; Toda Y; Crabb D; Kashiwagi K; Fitzke FW; Tsukahara S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 May; 87(5):604-8. PubMed ID: 12714404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a test grid using Eye Movement Perimetry for screening glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Kadavath Meethal NS; Mazumdar D; Asokan R; Panday M; van der Steen J; Vermeer KA; Lemij HG; George RJ; Pel JJM
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 256(2):371-379. PubMed ID: 29282563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Blue-on-yellow perimetry using an Armaly glaucoma screening program.
    Maeda H; Tanaka Y; Nakamura M; Yamamoto M
    Ophthalmologica; 1999; 213(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 9885383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Topography of early glaucomatous visual field defects in computerized perimetry].
    Gramer E; Gerlach R; Krieglstein GK; Leydhecker W
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1982 Jun; 180(6):515-23. PubMed ID: 7132176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detectability of Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma With High-resolution Perimetry.
    Numata T; Matsumoto C; Okuyama S; Tanabe F; Hashimoto S; Nomoto H; Shimomura Y
    J Glaucoma; 2016 Oct; 25(10):847-853. PubMed ID: 27367134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Computer perimetry of glaucomatous visual field defects at different stimulus sizes (author's transl)].
    Gramer E; Kontić D; Krieglstein GK
    Ophthalmologica; 1981; 183(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 7312301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional evaluation of the macular area in early glaucoma using microperimetry.
    Phuljhele S; Angmo D; Aalok L; Parwal S; Azad RV; Gupta V; Sihota R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2021 Apr; 69(4):876-881. PubMed ID: 33727451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing the Performance of Compass Perimetry With Humphrey Field Analyzer in Eyes With Glaucoma.
    Rao HL; Raveendran S; James V; Dasari S; Palakurthy M; Reddy HB; Pradhan ZS; Rao DA; Puttaiah NK; Devi S
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar; 26(3):292-297. PubMed ID: 27977480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Color perimetry of glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Hart WM; Gordon MO
    Ophthalmology; 1984 Apr; 91(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 6717918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the OKP visual field screening test with the Humphrey field analyser.
    Vernon SA; Quigley HA
    Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 5)():521-4. PubMed ID: 1286719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [What new knowledge has automated perimetry with the Octopus brought on glaucomatous visual field changes?].
    Gloor B; Stürmer J; Vökt B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1984 Apr; 184(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 6727246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.