These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12085153)

  • 1. Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot.
    Diaz-Arrastia C; Jurnalov C; Gomez G; Townsend C
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Sep; 16(9):1271-3. PubMed ID: 12085153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgical techniques: robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system.
    Advincula AP
    Int J Med Robot; 2006 Dec; 2(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 17520648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology.
    Lambaudie E; Houvenaeghel G; Walz J; Bannier M; Buttarelli M; Gurriet B; De Laparrent T; Blache JL
    Surg Endosc; 2008 Dec; 22(12):2743-7. PubMed ID: 18814002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robot-assisted hysterectomy vs total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes.
    Göçmen A; Şanlıkan F; Uçar MG
    Int J Med Robot; 2012 Dec; 8(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 23081780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report.
    Fader AN; Escobar PF
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 19481243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynaecological oncology; initial experience at Oslo Radium Hospital and 16 months follow-up.
    Sert MB; Eraker R
    Int J Med Robot; 2009 Dec; 5(4):410-4. PubMed ID: 19569081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Solo surgery--early results of robot-assisted three-dimensional laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Tuschy B; Berlit S; Brade J; Sütterlin M; Hornemann A
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2014 Aug; 23(4):230-4. PubMed ID: 24564722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
    Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience.
    Reynolds RK; Advincula AP
    Am J Surg; 2006 Apr; 191(4):555-60. PubMed ID: 16531155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical technique enhances the efficiency of robotic hysterectomy.
    Feuer G; Hernandez P; Barker J
    Int J Med Robot; 2011 Mar; 7(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 21341356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
    Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
    Scheib SA; Fader AN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: comparison with total laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy; one surgeon's experience at the Norwegian Radium Hospital.
    Sert MB; Abeler V
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Jun; 121(3):600-4. PubMed ID: 21353294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the use of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer with harmonic scalpel in total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Demirturk F; Aytan H; Caliskan AC
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Jun; 33(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 17578364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robot-assisted laparoscopic trachelectomy after supracervical hysterectomy.
    Nezhat CH; Rogers JD
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Sep; 90(3):850.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18054926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomised prospective study of laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy each with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.
    Raju KS; Auld BJ
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Dec; 101(12):1068-71. PubMed ID: 7826960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new approach to treatment of early-stage cervical carcinoma: entire laparoscopic abdominal radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy without vaginal cuff closure--case reports.
    Sert B; Abeler VM; Dørum A; Trope CG
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2006; 27(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 17139990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy vs traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy: five metaanalyses.
    Scandola M; Grespan L; Vicentini M; Fiorini P
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(6):705-15. PubMed ID: 22024259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.