359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12085870)
1. A considered approach to sterilization of mentally retarded youth.
Perrin JC
Am J Dis Child; 1976 Mar; 130(3):288-90. PubMed ID: 12085870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Birthrights.
Economist; 1973 Jul; 248(6779):48. PubMed ID: 11664212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Balancing the right of the mentally retarded to obtain a therapeutic sterilization against the potential for abuse.
Irvine AC
Law Psychol Rev; 1988; 12():95-122. PubMed ID: 11660733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sexual sterilization--constitutional validity of involuntary sterilization and consent determinative of voluntariness.
Baker JD
Miss Law Rev; 1975; 40(3):509-26. PubMed ID: 11664500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Sterilization in Pennsylvania.
Beck PW; Soskis CW
Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(2):213-36. PubMed ID: 11652406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sterilization of the poor: two views on the need for protection from abuse.
Donovan P
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1976 Apr; 5(2):28-30. PubMed ID: 11664604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The law of fertility regulation in the United States: a 1980 review.
Isaacs SL
J Fam Law; 1980-1981; 19(1):65-96. PubMed ID: 11663114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Fairness is asked in sterilization funding for retarded.
Ob Gyn News; 1979 Mar; 14(6):3+. PubMed ID: 11661745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Legal crusade of the eternal children.
Jahn P
Macleans; 1981 Nov; 94(48):45-6. PubMed ID: 11658628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ruby v. Massey: sterilization of the mentally retarded.
Diehl JE
Cap Univ Law Rev; 1979; 9(1):191-206. PubMed ID: 11665269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Coerced sterilization under federally funded family planning programs.
Diamond E
New Engl Law Rev; 1976; 11(2):589-614. PubMed ID: 11664603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproductive freedom issues in legal services practice.
Law S
Clgh Rev; 1978 Nov; 12(7):389-403. PubMed ID: 11665039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A wink from the bench: the federal courts and abortion.
Uddo BJ
Tulane Law Rev; 1979 Feb; 53(2):398-464. PubMed ID: 11665104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The conflict between "disabling" and "enabling" paradigms in law: sterilization, the developmentally disabled, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
Dugan JC
Cornell Law Rev; 1993 Mar; 78(3):507-42. PubMed ID: 11659683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Birth control denied to the mentally retarded.
Bass MS
Humanist; 1979; 39(2):51-2. PubMed ID: 11664996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Capacity, competence, consent: voluntary sterilization of the mentally retarded.
Neuwirth GS; Heisler PA; Goldrich KS
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1974 Fall-1975 Winter; 6(2):447-72. PubMed ID: 11663600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. State regulations on protecting mentally disabled research subjects are ruled invalid.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Oct; 14(10):4-5. PubMed ID: 11658062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Sterilizing the retarded: constitutional, statutory and policy alternatives.
Sherlock RK; Sherlock RD
North Carol Law Rev; 1982 Jun; 60(5):943-83. PubMed ID: 11658718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Sterilization.
Califano JA
Forum (Wash); 1978; 2(2):7-13. PubMed ID: 11643514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Psychosurgery and informed consent.
Spoonhour JM
Univ Fla Law Rev; 1974; 26(3):432-52. PubMed ID: 11664397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
