These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12085911)

  • 1. Guide to decision-making in institutional review of proposals for human experimentation.
    Himmelsbach CK
    Man Med; 1978; 3(3):201-220. PubMed ID: 12085911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A protocol review guide to reduce IRB inconsistency.
    Prentice ED; Antonson DL
    IRB; 1987; 9(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 11649892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Institutional review boards as an instrument of assessment: research involving human subjects in the U.S.
    Gray BH
    Sci Technol Human Values; 1978; (25):. PubMed ID: 11663042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Xenografts and scientific evaluation.
    Tucker WR
    IRB; 1986; 8(2):10. PubMed ID: 11649749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A survey of university institutional review boards: characteristics, policies, and procedures.
    Hayes GJ; Hayes SC; Dykstra T
    IRB; 1995; 17(3):1-6. PubMed ID: 11654267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When does an experimental/innovative procedure become an accepted procedure?
    Norton ML
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1975 Oct; 38(4):161-5. PubMed ID: 11661188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Judging the ethical merit of clinical trials: what criteria do research ethics board members use?
    Meslin EM; Lavery JV; Sutherland HJ; Till JE
    IRB; 1994; 16(4):6-10. PubMed ID: 11654136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Should IRBs monitor research more strictly?
    Christakis NA
    IRB; 1988; 10(2):8-10. PubMed ID: 11650024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethical issues in the substantive and procedural aspects of research ethics review.
    Meslin EM
    Health Law Can; 1993; 13(3):179-91. PubMed ID: 10125789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The report of the Advisory Research Committee on the ethics review of research involving human subjects.
    Queens Gazette; 1974 : 1-5, 30 Jan; 6(4) Suppl):. PubMed ID: 11663457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structuring the review of human genetics protocols, part III: gene therapy studies.
    Glass KC; Weijer C; Cournoyer D; Lemmens T; Palmour RM; Shapiro SH; Freedman B
    IRB; 1999; 21(2):1-9. PubMed ID: 11657874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The wages of sin.
    Pattullo EL
    IRB; 1985; 7(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 11649753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychosurgery in Massachusetts: a task force report.
    Stone AA
    Mass Journal Ment Health; 1975; 5(3):26-54. PubMed ID: 11664587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How many protocols are deferred? One IRB's experience.
    Chlebowski RT
    IRB; 1984; 6(5):9-10. PubMed ID: 11650665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Protecting human subjects from harm through improved risk judgments.
    Meslin EM
    IRB; 1990; 12(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 11651973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Placebo: pro and con.
    Lapierre YD; Weijer C
    NCEHR Commun; 1997-1998 Winter-Spring; 8(2):11-5. PubMed ID: 11660612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inconsistency and IRBs: flaws in the Goldman-Katz study.
    Levine RJ; Katz MD; Goldman J
    IRB; 1984; 6(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 11649541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The ethical tribunal in medicine.
    Dagi TF
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1974 Mar; 54(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 11661085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The burgeoning law of medical experimentation involving human subjects.
    Bryant LE
    John Marshall J Pract Proced; 1974; 8(1):19-51. PubMed ID: 11663465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A case study in adolescent participation in clinical research: eleven clinical sites, one common protocol, and eleven IRBs.
    Rogers AS; Schwartz DF; Weissman G; English A;
    IRB; 1999; 21(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 11657967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.