160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12085920)
21. Moral distinctions.
Dorff EN
Shma; 1990 Nov; 21(401):6-8. PubMed ID: 11650929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. What Is a Person? edited by Michael F. Goodman, and Moral Personhood: An Essay in the Philosophy of Moral Psychology by G.E. Scott.
Elliot R
Bioethics; 1992 Jan; 6(1):41-60. PubMed ID: 11651507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Infanticide for handicapped infants: sometimes it's a metaphysical dispute.
Long TA
J Med Ethics; 1988 Jun; 14(2):79-81. PubMed ID: 2969052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Affirming voluntary and active euthanasia from a theological-ethical perspective.
Das S
Euthan Rev; 1987; 2(1 2):96-106. PubMed ID: 11649222
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Why abortion is immoral.
Marquis D
J Philos; 1989 Apr; 86(4):183-202. PubMed ID: 11782094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The constitutional right to suicide, the quality of life, and the "slippery slope": an explicit reply to lingering concerns.
Neeley GS
Akron Law Rev; 1994; 28(1):53-76. PubMed ID: 11660026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Against infanticide.
Keyserlingk EW
Law Med Health Care; 1986 Sep; 14(3-4):154-7. PubMed ID: 3645225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Is compromise possible? Medical and philosophical views on euthanasia.
Frank AW
J Palliat Care; 1994; 10(4):35-9. PubMed ID: 11644648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The real ethic of death and dying.
Cantor NL
Mich Law Rev; 1996 May; 94(6):1718-38. PubMed ID: 11656929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Proximate personhood as a standard for making difficult treatment decisions: imperiled newborns as a case study.
Walters JW
Bioethics; 1992 Jan; 6(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 11651503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Vital distinctions, mortal questions: debating euthanasia and health care costs.
Callahan D
Commonweal; 1988 Jul; 115(13):397-404. PubMed ID: 11652542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The "value of human life" and "the right to death": some reflections on Cruzan and Ronald Dworkin.
Finnis J
South Ill Univ Law J; 1993; 17():559-71. PubMed ID: 11656302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Engelhardt on the abortion and euthanasia of defective infants.
Jones GE
Linacre Q; 1983 May; 50(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 11653532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Euthanasia in the age of genetic engineering.
Feyerabend E
Reprod Genet Eng; 1989; 2(3):247-9. PubMed ID: 11652007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A Jewish approach to end-stage medical care.
Dorff EN
Conserv Jud; 1991; 43(3):3-51. PubMed ID: 11651008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Yes, the baby should live.
Davis A
New Sci; 1985 Oct; 108(1480):54. PubMed ID: 11655713
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Professor Pleasure -- or Professor Death?
Schaefer N
Hum Life Rev; 1998; 24(4):50-2. PubMed ID: 11657570
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Why doctors must not kill.
Kass LR
Commonweal; 1991 Aug; 118(14 Suppl):472-6. PubMed ID: 11651040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Terminating treatment in Hungary Allocating death.
Kovacs J; Evans D
Bull Med Ethics; 1991 Oct; No. 72():13-20. PubMed ID: 11659452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Must the bearer of a right have the concept of that to which he has a right?
Stevens JC
Ethics; 1984 Oct; 95(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 11651787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
