These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12086306)

  • 1. The effects of optical defocus on the legibility of the Tumbling-E and Landolt-C.
    Reich LN; Ekabutr M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Jun; 79(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 12086306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of blur and subsequent adaptation on visual acuity using letter and Landolt C charts: differences between emmetropes and myopes.
    Poulere E; Moschandreas J; Kontadakis GA; Pallikaris IG; Plainis S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 23297779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Simulated and Real Spherical and Astigmatism Defocus on Visual Acuity and Image Quality Score.
    Vincent M; Marin G; Legras R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Jan; 97(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 31895276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation of optotypes with the Landolt ring--a fresh look at the comparability of optotypes.
    Grimm W; Rassow B; Wesemann W; Saur K; Hilz R
    Optom Vis Sci; 1994 Jan; 71(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8146001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distance and near visual performance in pseudophakic eyes with simulated spherical and astigmatic blur.
    Serra P; Chisholm C; Sanchez Trancon A; Cox M
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Mar; 99(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 26840890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of visual acuity charts in young adults and patients with diabetic retinopathy.
    Plainis S; Kontadakis G; Feloni E; Giannakopoulou T; Tsilimbaris MK; Pallikaris IG; Moschandreas J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 90(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 23314130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A reassessment and comparison of the Landolt C and tumbling E charts in managing amblyopia.
    Lai YH; Wu HJ; Chang SJ
    Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):18277. PubMed ID: 34521954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of dioptric blur on reading performance.
    Chung ST; Jarvis SH; Cheung SH
    Vision Res; 2007 Jun; 47(12):1584-94. PubMed ID: 17442363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison of two visual acuity tests in school enrolment examinations : Tumbling E test versus Freiburg visual acuity test].
    Bach M; Reuter M; Lagrèze WA
    Ophthalmologe; 2016 Aug; 113(8):684-9. PubMed ID: 27048550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Legibility Assessment of Visual Word Form Symbols for Visual Tests.
    Tsai LT; Jang Y; Liao KM; Chen CC
    Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):3338. PubMed ID: 30833715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Legibility variations of Chinese characters and implications for visual acuity measurement in Chinese reading population.
    Zhang JY; Zhang T; Xue F; Liu L; Yu C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 May; 48(5):2383-90. PubMed ID: 17460306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of optotypes of Amsterdam Picture Chart with those of Tumbling-E, LEA symbols, ETDRS, and Landolt-C in non-amblyopic and amblyopic patients.
    Engin O; Despriet DD; van der Meulen-Schot HM; Romers A; Slot X; Sang MT; Fronius M; Kelderman H; Simonsz HJ
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 252(12):2013-20. PubMed ID: 25228066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of optical defocus on detection and recognition of vanishing optotype letters in the fovea and periphery.
    Shah N; Dakin SC; Anderson RS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):7063-70. PubMed ID: 22969070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Correlation of letter optotypes with Landholt ring for different degrees of visual acuity].
    Rassow B; Wang Y
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1999 Aug; 215(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 10483562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of simulated refractive error on adult visual acuity for paediatric tests.
    Paudel N; Jacobs RJ; Sloan R; Denny S; Shea K; Thompson B; Anstice N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):521-530. PubMed ID: 28656671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Myopic astigmatism and presbyopia trial.
    Savage H; Rothstein M; Davuluri G; El Ghormli L; Zaetta DM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 May; 135(5):628-32. PubMed ID: 12719069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of the Lithander (Kolt test) pediatric visual acuity test with the standardized Landolt ring test].
    Cavazos H; Schulz E; Rassow B; Wesemann W
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1990 Oct; 197(4):324-8. PubMed ID: 2280568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of visual acuity in preschool children as measured with Landolt C and Tumbling E charts.
    Lai YH; Wang HZ; Hsu HT
    J AAPOS; 2011 Jun; 15(3):251-5. PubMed ID: 21777798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a visual acuity test using closed Landolt-Cs to determine malingering.
    Kröger N; Jürgens C; Kohlmann T; Tost F
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 255(12):2459-2465. PubMed ID: 29046952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pilot study: effect of age on visual acuity with defocus and astigmatism.
    Mathur A; Suheimat M; Atchison DA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Mar; 92(3):267-71. PubMed ID: 25479447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.