These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12086325)

  • 21. Accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) craniofacial cephalometric landmarks on a low-dose 3D computed tomograph.
    Olszewski R; Reychler H; Cosnard G; Denis JM; Vynckier S; Zech F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):261-7. PubMed ID: 18606747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison between two-dimensional and midsagittal three-dimensional cephalometric measurements of dry human skulls.
    Damstra J; Fourie Z; Ren Y
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 49(5):392-5. PubMed ID: 20615593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Validity and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements obtained from digital photographs of analogue headfilms.
    Grybauskas S; Balciuniene I; Vetra J
    Stomatologija; 2007; 9(4):114-20. PubMed ID: 18303276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of the CT scanogram for assessment of craniofacial morphology.
    Lee FC; Noar JH; Evans RD
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Jan; 81(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 20936950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans.
    Gribel BF; Gribel MN; Frazäo DC; McNamara JA; Manzi FR
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Jan; 81(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 20936951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images.
    Brown AA; Scarfe WC; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):150-7. PubMed ID: 19123719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities.
    Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Three-dimensional analysis of biplanar cephalograms.
    Wu MC; Cheng KS; Chen YT; Liu JK; Ting WH
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):627-32. PubMed ID: 20660132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. From 2D to 3D: an algorithm to derive normal values for 3-dimensional computerized assessment.
    Gribel BF; Gribel MN; Manzi FR; Brooks SL; McNamara JA
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Jan; 81(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 20936948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Based Three-Dimensional McNamara Cephalometric Analysis.
    Santos RMGD; De Martino JM; Haiter Neto F; Passeri LA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 29(4):895-899. PubMed ID: 29381618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of film-object distance on posteroanterior cephalometric measurements: suggestions for standardized cephalometric methods.
    Ghafari J; Cater PE; Shofer FS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jul; 108(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 7598102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Three-dimensional computed tomography cephalometric craniofacial analysis: experimental validation in vitro.
    Olszewski R; Zech F; Cosnard G; Nicolas V; Macq B; Reychler H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Sep; 36(9):828-33. PubMed ID: 17825530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Bergé SJ; Swennen GR; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 67(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 19070753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of common hard tissue cephalometric measurements between computed tomography 3D reconstruction and conventional 2D cephalometric images.
    Yitschaky O; Redlich M; Abed Y; Faerman M; Casap N; Hiller N
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Jan; 81(1):11-16. PubMed ID: 20936949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position.
    Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Sanderink G
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 19106265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of reliability in anatomical landmark identification using two-dimensional digital cephalometrics and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography in vivo.
    Chien PC; Parks ET; Eraso F; Hartsfield JK; Roberts WE; Ofner S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Jul; 38(5):262-73. PubMed ID: 19474253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. "Ten-point" 3D cephalometric analysis using low-dosage cone beam computed tomography.
    Farronato G; Garagiola U; Dominici A; Periti G; de Nardi S; Carletti V; Farronato D
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 20529623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reliability of cephalometric landmark identification on three-dimensional computed tomographic images.
    Kim JH; An S; Hwang DM
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Apr; 60(3):320-325. PubMed ID: 34690019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Three-dimensional fetal cephalometry: an evaluation of the reliability of cephalometric measurements based on three-dimensional CT reconstructions and on dry skulls of sheep fetuses.
    Papadopoulos MA; Jannowitz C; Boettcher P; Henke J; Stolla R; Zeilhofer HF; Kovacs L; Erhardt W; Biemer E; Papadopulos NA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Aug; 33(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 15978824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study.
    Ghoneima A; Albarakati S; Baysal A; Uysal T; Kula K
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 23304973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.