685 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12086356)
1. Interest of a prescreening questionnaire to reduce the cost of bone densitometry.
Ben Sedrine W; Broers P; Devogelaer JP; Depresseux G; Kaufman JM; Goemaere S; Reginster JY
Osteoporos Int; 2002 May; 13(5):434-42. PubMed ID: 12086356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening for osteoporosis using easily obtainable biometrical data: diagnostic accuracy of measured, self-reported and recalled BMI, and related costs of bone mineral density measurements.
van der Voort DJ; Brandon S; Dinant GJ; van Wersch JW
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 10824239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of proposals of Belgian Social Security Institute for reimbursement of bone densitometry tests. Toward a cost-effective strategy for osteoporosis screening?
Ben Sedrine W; Ethgen O; Devogelaer JP; Depresseux G; Kaufman JM; Goemaere S; Reginster JY
Aging Clin Exp Res; 2004 Oct; 16(5):413-9. PubMed ID: 15636469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of accuracy and cost effectiveness of clinical criteria and BUA for referral for BMD assessment by DXA in osteoporotic and osteopenic perimenopausal subjects.
Langton CM; Langton DK; Beardsworth SA
Technol Health Care; 1999; 7(5):319-30. PubMed ID: 10543417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bone mineral density referral for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry using quantitative ultrasound as a prescreening tool in postmenopausal women from the general population: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Marín F; López-Bastida J; Díez-Pérez A; Sacristán JA;
Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Mar; 74(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 14708042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary prevention of osteoporosis: mass screening scenario or prescreening with questionnaires? An economic perspective.
Richy F; Ethgen O; Bruyere O; Mawet A; Reginster JY
J Bone Miner Res; 2004 Dec; 19(12):1955-60. PubMed ID: 15537437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and validation of the osteoporosis prescreening risk assessment (OPERA) tool to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density.
Salaffi F; Silveri F; Stancati A; Grassi W
Clin Rheumatol; 2005 Jun; 24(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 15549501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Utilization of DXA Bone Mineral Densitometry in Ontario: An Evidence-Based Analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(20):1-180. PubMed ID: 23074491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation (SCORE) in a sample of white women from Belgium.
Ben Sedrine W; Devogelaer JP; Kaufman JM; Goemaere S; Depresseux G; Zegels B; Deroisy R; Reginster JY
Bone; 2001 Oct; 29(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 11595621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maximising the cost effectiveness of BMD referral for DXA using ultrasound as a selective population pre-screen.
Langton CM; Ballard PA; Langton DK; Purdie DW
Technol Health Care; 1997 Jul; 5(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 9263372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiographic absorptiometry as a screening tool in male osteoporosis: results from the Odense Androgen Study.
Hansen SJ; Nielsen MM; Ryg J; Wraae K; Andersen M; Brixen K
Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):658-63. PubMed ID: 19488892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density are equally strongly associated with risk factors for osteoporosis.
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
J Bone Miner Res; 2001 Feb; 16(2):406-16. PubMed ID: 11204441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost effectiveness analysis of using quantitative ultrasound as a selective pre-screen for bone densitometry.
Sim MF; Stone MD; Phillips CJ; Cheung WY; Johansen A; Vasishta S; Pettit RJ; Evans WD
Technol Health Care; 2005; 13(2):75-85. PubMed ID: 15912005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The usefulness of dual energy X-ray and laser absorptiometry of the calcaneus versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of hip and spine in diagnosing manifest osteoporosis.
de Klerk G; van der Velde D; van der Palen J; van Bergeijk L; Hegeman JH
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Feb; 129(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 18825395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost effectiveness analysis of BMD referral for DXA using ultrasound as a selective pre-screen in a group of women with low trauma Colles' fractures.
Sim MF; Stone M; Johansen A; Evans W
Technol Health Care; 2000; 8(5):277-84. PubMed ID: 11204173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An investigation of the diagnostic value of bilateral femoral neck bone mineral density measurements.
Petley GW; Taylor PA; Murrills AJ; Dennison E; Pearson G; Cooper C
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(8):675-9. PubMed ID: 11095170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The accuracy of bone mineral density at distal radius on non-forearm osteoporosis identification.
Trivitayaratana W; Trivitayaratana P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Apr; 84(4):566-71. PubMed ID: 11460970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diffusion tensor imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy assessment of cancellous bone quality in femoral neck of healthy, osteopenic and osteoporotic subjects at 3T: Preliminary experience.
Manenti G; Capuani S; Fanucci E; Assako EP; Masala S; Sorge R; Iundusi R; Tarantino U; Simonetti G
Bone; 2013 Jul; 55(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 23507402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of a Swedish T-score reference population for women causes a two-fold increase in the amount of postmenopausal Swedish patients that fulfill the WHO criteria for osteoporosis.
Ribom EL; Ljunggren O; Mallmin H
J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(3):404-11. PubMed ID: 18280191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative ultrasound or clinical risk factors--which best identifies women at risk of osteoporosis?
Stewart A; Reid DM
Br J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 73(866):165-71. PubMed ID: 10884730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
