These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12086712)

  • 21. Is goal-directed attentional guidance just intertrial priming? A review.
    Lamy DF; Kristjánsson A
    J Vis; 2013 Jul; 13(3):14. PubMed ID: 23818660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Eye movements and the label feedback effect: Speaking modulates visual search via template integrity.
    Hebert KP; Goldinger SD; Walenchok SC
    Cognition; 2021 May; 210():104587. PubMed ID: 33508577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Encouraging top-down attention in visual search:A developmental perspective.
    Lookadoo R; Yang Y; Merrill EC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2007-2020. PubMed ID: 28718176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Distractor ratio and grouping processes in visual conjunction search.
    Poisson ME; Wilkinson F
    Perception; 1992; 21(1):21-38. PubMed ID: 1528701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Attentional inhibition in patients with focal frontal lobe lesions.
    McDonald CR; Bauer RM; Filoteo JV; Grande L; Roper SN; Gilmore R
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2005 May; 27(4):485-503. PubMed ID: 15962693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons.
    Wolfe JM; Butcher SJ; Lee C; Hyle M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Apr; 29(2):483-502. PubMed ID: 12760630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A slowing effect on visual search by advance information in pigeons (Columba livia): a comparison with humans (Homo sapiens).
    Sekiguchi K; Ushitani T; Jitsumori M
    Behav Processes; 2011 Jan; 86(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20920555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Orientation search is mediated by distractor suppression: evidence from priming of pop-out.
    Lamy D; Yashar A; Ruderman L
    Vision Res; 2013 Apr; 81():29-35. PubMed ID: 23380440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Identity negative priming: a phenomenon of perception, recognition or selection?
    Schrobsdorff H; Ihrke M; Behrendt J; Herrmann JM; Hasselhorn M
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32946. PubMed ID: 22427915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The role of perceptual load in negative priming.
    Lavie N; Fox E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Jun; 26(3):1038-52. PubMed ID: 10884008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The involvement of posterior parietal cortex and frontal eye fields in spatially primed visual search.
    Lane AR; Smith DT; Schenk T; Ellison A
    Brain Stimul; 2012 Jan; 5(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 22037138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of working memory representations in the control of attention.
    Woodman GF; Luck SJ; Schall JD
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Sep; 17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i118-24. PubMed ID: 17725994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Selection history alters attentional filter settings persistently and beyond top-down control.
    Kadel H; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2017 May; 54(5):736-754. PubMed ID: 28169422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electrophysiological revelations of trial history effects in a color oddball search task.
    Shin E; Chong SC
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Dec; 53(12):1878-1888. PubMed ID: 27699796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Testing the role of response repetition in spatial priming in visual search.
    Hilchey MD; Leber AB; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1362-1374. PubMed ID: 29949117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of top-down guidance and singleton priming on visual search.
    Lamy D; Bar-Anan Y; Egeth HE; Carmel T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Apr; 13(2):287-93. PubMed ID: 16892996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bottom-up and top-down control in visual search.
    van Zoest W; Donk M
    Perception; 2004; 33(8):927-37. PubMed ID: 15521692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Attentional capture during visual search is attenuated by target predictability: evidence from the N2pc, Pd, and topographic segmentation.
    Burra N; Kerzel D
    Psychophysiology; 2013 May; 50(5):422-30. PubMed ID: 23418888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The role of motor response in implicit encoding: evidence from intertrial priming in pop-out search.
    Yashar A; Makovski T; Lamy D
    Vision Res; 2013 Dec; 93():80-7. PubMed ID: 24400358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Polarity-dependent Effects of Biparietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Interplay between Target Location and Distractor Saliency in Visual Attention.
    Chechlacz M; Hansen PC; Geng JJ; Cazzoli D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 30(6):851-866. PubMed ID: 29393718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.