245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12087377)
21. Industry scientists look for benefits, not risks.
Hötzel MJ
Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6903):111. PubMed ID: 12226636
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Biotechnology. A new tack on herbicide resistance.
Stokstad E
Science; 2004 May; 304(5674):1089. PubMed ID: 15155917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. German Health Minister calls time out for Bt maize.
Peerenboom E
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):374. PubMed ID: 10748507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Modified genes spread to local maize.
Dalton R
Nature; 2008 Nov; 456(7219):149. PubMed ID: 19005518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Terminator no solution to gene flow.
Shand H
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):775-6. PubMed ID: 12147996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A cure for dyslexia?
Nat Neurosci; 2007 Feb; 10(2):135. PubMed ID: 17259957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Trait stacking in transgenic crops: challenges and opportunities.
Que Q; Chilton MD; de Fontes CM; He C; Nuccio M; Zhu T; Wu Y; Chen JS; Shi L
GM Crops; 2010; 1(4):220-9. PubMed ID: 21844677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. BIOTECHNOLOGY. Europe's rifts over transgenic crops deepen at key deadline.
Rabesandratana T
Science; 2015 Oct; 350(6256):18-9. PubMed ID: 26430094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Transgene introgression from genetically modified crops to their wild relatives.
Stewart CN; Halfhill MD; Warwick SI
Nat Rev Genet; 2003 Oct; 4(10):806-17. PubMed ID: 14526376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Coexistence in the EU-return of the moratorium on GM crops?
Devos Y; Demont M; Sanvido O
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Nov; 26(11):1223-5. PubMed ID: 18997757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The difficulties of defining the term "GM".
Ramsay T
Science; 2004 Mar; 303(5665):1765-9; author reply 1765-9. PubMed ID: 15052702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The politics of publication.
Lawrence PA
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Tougher rules aim to prevent gene flow into crops.
Hoag H
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6928):103. PubMed ID: 12634744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Transgenic crops: a cautionary tale.
Nigh R; Benbrook C; Brush S; Garcia-Barrios L; Ortega-Paczka R; Perales HR
Science; 2000 Mar; 287(5460):1927. PubMed ID: 10755939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Genetically modified myths and realities.
Parrott W
N Biotechnol; 2010 Nov; 27(5):545-51. PubMed ID: 20609417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Retractions' realities.
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
Croat Med J; 2003 Dec; 44(6):770-83. PubMed ID: 14725274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Genetically modified corn--environmental benefits and risks.
Gewin V
PLoS Biol; 2003 Oct; 1(1):E8. PubMed ID: 14551906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Detecting (trans)gene flow to landraces in centers of crop origin: lessons from the case of maize in Mexico.
Cleveland DA; Soleri D; Cuevas FA; Crossa J; Gepts P
Environ Biosafety Res; 2005; 4(4):197-208; discussion 209-15. PubMed ID: 16827547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Alleged flaws in gene-transfer paper spark row over genetically modified maize.
Butler D
Nature; 2002 Feb; 415(6875):948-9. PubMed ID: 11875532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
