118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12087438)
1. 3D volume rendering using multislice CT for dental implants.
Cavalcanti MG; Ruprecht A; Vannier MW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):218-23. PubMed ID: 12087438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of spiral computed tomography for dental implants.
Cavalcanti MG; Yang J; Ruprecht A; Vannier MW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Nov; 27(6):329-33. PubMed ID: 10895630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accurate linear measurements in the anterior maxilla using orthoradially reformatted spiral computed tomography.
Cavalcanti MG; Yang J; Ruprecht A; Vannier MW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 10740466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: implications for clinical applications.
Cavalcanti MG; Rocha SS; Vannier MW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 May; 33(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 15371317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 2-D and 3-D reconstructions of spiral computed tomography in localization of the inferior alveolar canal for dental implants.
Yang J; Cavalcanti MG; Ruprecht A; Vannier MW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Mar; 87(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 10102603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of three-dimensional X-ray images: reconstruction from conventional tomograms, compact computerized tomography images, and multislice helical computerized tomography images.
Naitoh M; Katsumata A; Kubota Y; Ariji E
J Oral Implantol; 2005; 31(5):234-41. PubMed ID: 16265853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Subjective image quality assessment of cross sectional imaging methods for the symphyseal region of the mandible prior to dental implant placement.
Shelley AM; Brunton P; Horner K
J Dent; 2011 Nov; 39(11):764-70. PubMed ID: 21875641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
Ekestubbe A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images.
Hanazawa T; Sano T; Seki K; Okano T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Apr; 15(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 15008935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determining position of the inferior alveolar nerve via anatomical dissection and micro-computed tomography in preparation for dental implants.
Massey ND; Galil KA; Wilson TD
J Can Dent Assoc; 2013; 79():d39. PubMed ID: 23920072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: a pilot study.
Loubele M; Maes F; Schutyser F; Marchal G; Jacobs R; Suetens P
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 16876067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional computed tomography landmark measurement in craniofacial surgical planning: experimental validation in vitro.
Cavalcanti MG; Haller JW; Vannier MW
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Jun; 57(6):690-4. PubMed ID: 10368094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of the volume of oral tumors by three-dimensional spiral computed tomography.
Cavalcanti MG; Vannier MW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 10654034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging compared with computed tomography for implant planning.
Aguiar MF; Marques AP; Carvalho AC; Cavalcanti MG
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Apr; 19(4):362-5. PubMed ID: 18266874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A questionnaire study to investigate custom and practice of imaging methods for the anterior region of the mandible prior to dental implant placement.
Shelley AM; Wardle L; Goodwin M; Brunton P; Horner K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(3):20120179. PubMed ID: 23439687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The accuracy of 3D-CT volume rendering for craniofacial linear measurements].
Liu DX; Wang CL; Liu L; Dong ZY; Ke HF; Yu ZY
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2006 Oct; 15(5):517-20. PubMed ID: 17348228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Precision for computer-guided implant placement: using 3D planning software and fixed intraoral reference points.
Holst S; Blatz MB; Eitner S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 65(3):393-9. PubMed ID: 17307583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can mandibular depiction be improved by changing the thickness of double-oblique computed tomography images?
Naitoh M; Katsumata A; Hiraiwa Y; Aimiya H; Ohsaki C; Ariji E
Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 18784527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictability of a three-dimensional planning system for oral implant surgery.
Jacobs R; Adriansens A; Verstreken K; Suetens P; van Steenberghe D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 10522199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
