These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12087441)

  • 1. Hand-held three-dimensional dental X-ray system: technical description and preliminary results.
    Webber RL; Webber SE; Moore J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):240-8. PubMed ID: 12087441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stationary intraoral digital tomosynthesis using a carbon nanotube X-ray source array.
    Shan J; Tucker AW; Gaalaas LR; Wu G; Platin E; Mol A; Lu J; Zhou O
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(9):20150098. PubMed ID: 26090933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Virtual radiographs computed from TACT volume data as a gold standard for image registration prior to subtraction.
    Lehmann TM; Hemler PF; Webber RL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 12058267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tuned-aperture computed tomography (TACT). Theory and application for three-dimensional dento-alveolar imaging.
    Webber RL; Horton RA; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 9446991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implementation of a generalized TACT algorithm for arbitrary source-object distances.
    Linnenbrügger NI; Webber RL; Lehmann TM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 12087442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forensic oral imaging quality of hand-held dental X-ray devices: comparison of two image receptors and two devices.
    Pittayapat P; Thevissen P; Fieuws S; Jacobs R; Willems G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Jan; 194(1-3):20-7. PubMed ID: 19913377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Radiation exposure and 3 dimensional imaging options of SIREMOBIL Iso-C(3D) for planning surgical dental interventions].
    Heiland M; Schulze D; Flinzberg S; Thurmann H; Rother U; Schmelzle R
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2004 Feb; 8(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 14991419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
    Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for dental use with a multidetector row helical CT machine.
    Hashimoto K; Arai Y; Iwai K; Araki M; Kawashima S; Terakado M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Mar; 95(3):371-7. PubMed ID: 12627112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the effect of task-specific with fixed beam alignment in tuned-aperture computed tomography.
    Webber RL; Hendrickson JL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jul; 29(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 10918455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital tomosynthesis-experiences with a new imaging device for the dental field.
    Ziegler CM; Franetzki M; Denig T; Mühling J; Hassfeld S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2003 Mar; 7(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 12673437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use.
    Arai Y; Tammisalo E; Iwai K; Hashimoto K; Shinoda K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jul; 28(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 10455389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A method for correcting for errors produced by variable magnification in three-dimensional tuned-aperture computed tomography.
    Webber RL; Bettermann W
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Sep; 28(5):305-10. PubMed ID: 10490750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of number of projections on image quality of local CT.
    van Daatselaar AN; van der Stelt PF; Weenen J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Nov; 33(6):361-9. PubMed ID: 15665229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating phantom image quality parameters to optimise patient radiation dose in dental digital radiology.
    Gonzalez L; Vano E; Fernandez R; Ziraldo V; Delgado J; Delgado V; Moro J; Ubeda C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 22232776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dosimetric characterization of a cone-beam O-arm imaging system.
    Zhang J; Weir V; Fajardo L; Lin J; Hsiung H; Ritenour ER
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2009; 17(4):305-17. PubMed ID: 19923687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated hybrid TACT volume reconstructions.
    Linnenbrügger NI; Webber RL; Kobbelt LP; Lehmann TM
    Methods Inf Med; 2004; 43(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 15472740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors.
    Attaelmanan AG; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 May; 91(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 11346743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 3-D volume imaging for dentistry: a new dimension.
    Danforth RA; Dus I; Mah J
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2003 Nov; 31(11):817-23. PubMed ID: 14696833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD; Geibel MA
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.