BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

497 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12087549)

  • 1. Cast articulation accuracy using rigid cast stabilization.
    Gunderson RB; Siegel SC
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 12087549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determining the accuracy of articulator interchangeability and hinge axis reproducibility.
    Hatzi P; Millstein P; Maya A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):236-45. PubMed ID: 11264930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
    Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Materials for interocclusal records and their ability to reproduce a 3-dimensional jaw relationship.
    Ockert-Eriksson G; Eriksson A; Lockowandt P; Eriksson O
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11203625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproducibility of occlusal contacts relative to mounting cast variables.
    Peregrina A; Feil PH
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Sep; 25(9):617-9. PubMed ID: 7568714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of two face-bow/semi-adjustable articulator systems in transferring the maxillary occlusal cant.
    Nazir N; Sujesh M; Kumar R; Sreenivas P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 23257473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A clinical evaluation of materials for interocclusal registration in centric relation.
    Pagnano VO; Bezzon OL; de Mattos MG; Ribeiro RF
    Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 11213793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The ability of different materials to reproduce accurate records of interocclusal relationships in the vertical dimension.
    Ghazal M; Albashaireh ZS; Kern M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 35(11):816-20. PubMed ID: 18482345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster.
    Wise M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Single step approach to make diagnostic impressions of both the arches and face bow transfer: a novel technique.
    Komuravelli AK; Suresh Sajjan MC
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 22842240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Articulator-related registration--a simple concept for minimizing eccentric occlusal errors in the articulator.
    Pröschel P; Morneburg T; Hugger A; Kordass B; Ottl P; Niedermeier W; Wichmann M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 12066493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The lateral leeway in the habitual intercuspation: experimental studies and literature review.
    Utz KH; Müller F; Lückerath W; Schwarting P; Noethlichs W; Büttner R; Fuss E; Grüner M; Koeck B
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 34(6):406-13. PubMed ID: 17518974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Face bow and articulator for planning orthognathic surgery: 1 face bow.
    Walker F; Ayoub AF; Moos KF; Barbenel J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 46(7):567-72. PubMed ID: 18462852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional analysis of models articulated in the seated condylar position from a deprogrammed asymptomatic population: a prospective study. Part 1.
    Cordray FE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):619-30. PubMed ID: 16679202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative study between 2 methods of mounting models in semiadjustable articulator for orthognathic surgery.
    Mayrink G; Sawazaki R; Asprino L; de Moraes M; Fernandes Moreira RW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 69(11):2879-82. PubMed ID: 21496992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Face bow and articulator for planning orthognathic surgery: 2 articulator.
    Walker F; Ayoub AF; Moos KF; Barbenel J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 46(7):573-8. PubMed ID: 18462853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of adding a stone base on the accuracy of working casts using different types of dental stone.
    Al-Abidi K; Ellakwa A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep; 7(4):17-28. PubMed ID: 16957787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.