These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12088245)

  • 1. Dynamic field theory of movement preparation.
    Erlhagen W; Schöner G
    Psychol Rev; 2002 Jul; 109(3):545-72. PubMed ID: 12088245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Behavioral and electrocortical evidence of an interaction between probability and task metrics in movement preparation.
    McDowell K; Jeka JJ; Schöner G; Hatfield BD
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Jun; 144(3):303-13. PubMed ID: 12021812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence for distinct steps in response preparation from a delayed response paradigm.
    Shin YK; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():42-51. PubMed ID: 30218843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Default motor preparation under conditions of response uncertainty.
    Forgaard CJ; Maslovat D; Carlsen AN; Franks IM
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Dec; 215(3-4):235-45. PubMed ID: 21997330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The mechanisms of movement preparation: a precuing study.
    Bock O; Eversheim U
    Behav Brain Res; 2000 Feb; 108(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 10680760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Motor preparation of spatially and temporally defined movements: evidence from startle.
    Maslovat D; Hodges NJ; Chua R; Franks IM
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 Aug; 106(2):885-94. PubMed ID: 21613586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preshaping and continuous evolution of motor cortical representations during movement preparation.
    Bastian A; Schöner G; Riehle A
    Eur J Neurosci; 2003 Oct; 18(7):2047-58. PubMed ID: 14622238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of directional compatibility on the response latencies of ocular and manual movements.
    Niechwiej-Szwedo E; McIlroy WE; Green R; Verrier MC
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 162(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 15599726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reaction time and movement duration influence on end point accuracy in a fast reaching task.
    Skurvidas A; Mickevichiene D; Cesnavichiene V; Gutnik B; Nash D
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2012; 38(3):73-80. PubMed ID: 22830246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A motor planning stage represents the shape of upcoming movement trajectories.
    Wong AL; Goldsmith J; Krakauer JW
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Aug; 116(2):296-305. PubMed ID: 27098032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Planning "discrete" movements using a continuous system: insights from a dynamic field theory of movement preparation.
    Schutte AR; Spencer JP
    Motor Control; 2007 Apr; 11(2):166-208. PubMed ID: 17575340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interaction of temporal and ordinal representations in movement sequences.
    Kornysheva K; Sierk A; Diedrichsen J
    J Neurophysiol; 2013 Mar; 109(5):1416-24. PubMed ID: 23221413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Motor preparation and the effects of practice: evidence from startle.
    Maslovat D; Hodges NJ; Chua R; Franks IM
    Behav Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 125(2):226-40. PubMed ID: 21280935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simon effects in action sequences.
    Braun C; Kibele A
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Nov; 236(11):2913-2922. PubMed ID: 30076426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Beneficial effects of ambiguous precues: parallel motor preparation or reduced premotoric processing time?
    Jentzsch I; Leuthold H; Richard Ridderinkhof K
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Mar; 41(2):231-44. PubMed ID: 15032988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impairment of movement initiation and execution but not preparation in idiopathic dystonia.
    Jahanshahi M; Rowe J; Fuller R
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Oct; 140(4):460-8. PubMed ID: 11685399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-target stimuli in the visual field influence movement preparation in upper-limb reaching.
    Neely KA; Morris LJ
    Neurosci Lett; 2015 Sep; 604():178-82. PubMed ID: 26222255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The facilitation of motor actions by acoustic and electric stimulation.
    Marinovic W; Milford M; Carroll T; Riek S
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Dec; 52(12):1698-710. PubMed ID: 26338375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learning and transfer of bimanual multifrequency patterns: effector-independent and effector-specific levels of movement representation.
    Vangheluwe S; Suy E; Wenderoth N; Swinnen SP
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 170(4):543-54. PubMed ID: 16307261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural mechanisms of spatial stimulus-response compatibility: the effect of crossed-hand position.
    Matsumoto E; Misaki M; Miyauchi S
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 158(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 15029467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.