160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12088456)
21. Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer.
Tartter PI; Kaplan J; Bleiweiss I; Gajdos C; Kong A; Ahmed S; Zapetti D
Am J Surg; 2000 Feb; 179(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 10773138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of touch imprint cytology and frozen section techniques in detecting breast malignancies.
Ahmed S; Ahmad M
J Pak Med Assoc; 2016 Mar; 66(3):292-5. PubMed ID: 26968279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prevalence and predictive factors for the detection of carcinoma in cavity margin performed at the time of breast lumpectomy.
Tengher-Barna I; Hequet D; Reboul-Marty J; Frassati-Biaggi A; Seince N; Rodrigues-Faure A; Uzan M; Ziol M
Mod Pathol; 2009 Feb; 22(2):299-305. PubMed ID: 18997732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Minimizing local recurrence after breast conserving therapy using intraoperative shaved margins to determine pathologic tumor clearance.
Camp ER; McAuliffe PF; Gilroy JS; Morris CG; Lind DS; Mendenhall NP; Copeland EM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Dec; 201(6):855-61. PubMed ID: 16310688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy of frozen section analysis versus specimen radiography during breast-conserving surgery for nonpalpable lesions.
Weber WP; Engelberger S; Viehl CT; Zanetti-Dallenbach R; Kuster S; Dirnhofer S; Wruk D; Oertli D; Marti WR
World J Surg; 2008 Dec; 32(12):2599-606. PubMed ID: 18836763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Intraoperative imprint cytology for real-time assessment of surgical margins during partial nephrectomy: A comparison with frozen section.
Özsoy M; Klatte T; Wiener H; Siller-Matula J; Schmidbauer J
Urol Oncol; 2015 Feb; 33(2):67.e25-9. PubMed ID: 25176582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Initial margin status for invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast and subsequent identification of carcinoma in reexcision specimens.
Skripenova S; Layfield LJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Jan; 134(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 20073613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long-term results of breast conservation.
Smitt MC; Nowels KW; Zdeblick MJ; Jeffrey S; Carlson RW; Stockdale FE; Goffinet DR
Cancer; 1995 Jul; 76(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 8625101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The role of frozen section analysis of margins during breast conservation surgery.
Weber S; Storm FK; Stitt J; Mahvi DM
Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 9327150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Separate cavity margin sampling at the time of initial breast lumpectomy significantly reduces the need for reexcisions.
Cao D; Lin C; Woo SH; Vang R; Tsangaris TN; Argani P
Am J Surg Pathol; 2005 Dec; 29(12):1625-32. PubMed ID: 16327435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cytology as an alternative to frozen section at the time of nephron-sparing surgery to evaluate surgical margin status.
Palermo SM; Dechet C; Trenti E; Mian C; Lodde M; Comploj E; Mazzoleni G; Hanspeter E; Ambrosini Spaltro A; Mayr R; Pycha A
Urology; 2013 Nov; 82(5):1071-5. PubMed ID: 24044918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical outcomes of an intraoperative surgical margin assessment using the fresh frozen section method in patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery - a single center analysis.
Nowikiewicz T; Śrutek E; Głowacka-Mrotek I; Tarkowska M; Żyromska A; Zegarski W
Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13441. PubMed ID: 31530867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Should intraoperative frozen section evaluation of breast lumpectomy margins become routine practice?
Schnitt SJ; Morrow M
Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Nov; 138(5):635-8. PubMed ID: 23086762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Defining negative margins in DCIS patients treated with breast conservation therapy: The University of Chicago experience.
Sahoo S; Recant WM; Jaskowiak N; Tong L; Heimann R
Breast J; 2005; 11(4):242-7. PubMed ID: 15982389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Intraoperative frozen section analysis of margins in breast conserving surgery significantly decreases reoperative rates: one-year experience at an ambulatory surgical center.
Jorns JM; Visscher D; Sabel M; Breslin T; Healy P; Daignaut S; Myers JL; Wu AJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Nov; 138(5):657-69. PubMed ID: 23086766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Intraoperative imprint cytology in assessment of sentinel lymph nodes and lumpectomy surgical margins.
Hakam A; Khin NN
Clin Lab Med; 2005 Dec; 25(4):795-807, viii. PubMed ID: 16308093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery.
Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Intraoperative cytologic diagnosis of sentinel node metastases in breast cancer.
Nagashima T; Suzuki M; Yagata H; Nikaido T; Horiuchi F; Koda K; Miyazaki M
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(6):1028-32. PubMed ID: 14674073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Is frozen section analysis of reexcision lumpectomy margins worthwhile? Margin analysis in breast reexcisions.
Sauter ER; Hoffman JP; Ottery FD; Kowalyshyn MJ; Litwin S; Eisenberg BL
Cancer; 1994 May; 73(10):2607-12. PubMed ID: 8174059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of reexcision on the success of breast-conserving surgery.
Kearney TJ; Morrow M
Ann Surg Oncol; 1995 Jul; 2(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 7552618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
