132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12089780)
1. Gender and fitness to stand trial. A 5-year review of remands in Québec.
Crocker AG; Favreau OE; Caulet M
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2002; 25(1):67-84. PubMed ID: 12089780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Female follies: the forensic psychiatric assessment of women defendants.
Menzies RJ; Chunn DE; Webster CD
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1992; 15(2):179-93. PubMed ID: 1587653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of competency to stand trial: contribution of demographics, type of offense, clinical characteristics, and psycholegal ability.
Nicholson RA; Johnson WG
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1991; 14(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 1864694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The volume and characteristics of insanity defense pleas: an eight-state study.
Callahan LA; Steadman HJ; McGreevy MA; Robbins PC
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 1786413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In defense of the insanity defense.
Beigel H
Hillside J Clin Psychiatry; 1983; 5(1):73-90. PubMed ID: 6662497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Center for forensic psychiatry evaluation unit services.
Jackson NL
New Dir Ment Health Serv; 1996; (69):81-8. PubMed ID: 8935827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Georgia Court Competency Test: the base-rate problem.
Wildman RW; White PA; Brandenburg CE
Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 1):1055-8. PubMed ID: 2377402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Competence to stand trial in Connecticut.
Herron DC; Zonana HV; Crane LE
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983; 11(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 6640120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A paradoxical outcome of a regional review board decision: a case report.
Cashman FE
Can J Psychiatry; 1988 Nov; 33(8):778. PubMed ID: 3203282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Mentally disordered offenders in Sweden.
Lidberg L; Belfrage H
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 1786418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modification of criminal law and its impact on psychiatric expert opinions.
Hollweg M
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1998; 21(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 9526720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Further comments on the insanity defense in the aftermath of the Hinckley trial.
Halpern AL
Psychiatr Q; 1984; 56(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 6522530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [The reliability of expert assessment: comparative study of hospitalized or imprisoned patients following criminal behavior].
Tron P; Loas G
Ann Med Psychol (Paris); 1992 Dec; 150(10):741-5; discussion 745-6. PubMed ID: 1343504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Criminal policy for offenders with mental disorder in Japan.
Katoh H
Jpn J Psychiatry Neurol; 1994; 48 Suppl():19-23. PubMed ID: 7799538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Insanity defense continues to draw attention in Washington, state capitols.
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1983 Jan; 34(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 6826158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The insanity defence.
Pridmore S
Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1992 Dec; 26(4):678, 680. PubMed ID: 1476536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Is there a reason to criminalize psychiatric patients to create treatment facilities for them?].
Graf M; Eichhorn M
Psychiatr Prax; 2003 Apr; 30(3):105-7. PubMed ID: 12692734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Disposition of insanity acquittees in the United States Military.
Lande RG
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1990; 18(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 2245245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A follow-up study of persons found incompetent to stand trial and/or not guilty by reason of insanity in Quebec.
Hodgins S
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1983; 6(3-4):399-411. PubMed ID: 6090325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. An introduction to law relevant to mentally disordered offenders.
Dolan B
Crim Behav Ment Health; 2004; 14 Suppl 1():S12-8. PubMed ID: 16575810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
