These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12089799)

  • 1. [In vitro stability study of an improved implant system for minimally invasive transforaminal approach].
    Schneid S; Sabitzer RJ; Fuss FK; Grupp TM; Blömer W
    Orthopade; 2002 May; 31(5):488-93. PubMed ID: 12089799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
    Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
    Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis.
    Slucky AV; Brodke DS; Bachus KN; Droge JA; Braun JT
    Spine J; 2006; 6(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 16413452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion with secondary augmentation.
    Reis MT; Reyes PM; Bse ; Altun I; Newcomb AG; Singh V; Chang SW; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):720-726. PubMed ID: 27391398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MIS Expandable Interbody Spacers: A Literature Review and Biomechanical Comparison of an Expandable MIS TLIF With Conventional TLIF and ALIF.
    Cannestra AF; Peterson MD; Parker SR; Roush TF; Bundy JV; Turner AW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41 Suppl 8():S44-9. PubMed ID: 26825792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
    Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Ploumis A; Wu C; Fischer G; Mehbod AA; Wu W; Faundez A; Transfeldt EE
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Apr; 21(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 18391717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro stabilizing effect of a transforaminal compared with two posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages.
    Kettler A; Schmoelz W; Kast E; Gottwald M; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Nov; 30(22):E665-70. PubMed ID: 16284577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Novel pedicle screw and plate system provides superior stability in unilateral fixation for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: an in vitro biomechanical study.
    Li J; Xiao H; Zhu Q; Zhou Y; Li C; Liu H; Huang Z; Shang J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0123134. PubMed ID: 25807513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical effect of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and axial interbody threaded rod on range of motion and S1 screw loading in a destabilized L5-S1 spondylolisthesis model.
    Fleischer GD; Hart D; Ferrara LA; Freeman AL; Avidano EE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jan; 39(2):E82-8. PubMed ID: 24150429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study.
    Ambati DV; Wright EK; Lehman RA; Kang DG; Wagner SC; Dmitriev AE
    Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1812-22. PubMed ID: 24983669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the Susceptibility to Implant Failure in the Lateral, Posterior, and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Oikawa R; Murakami H; Endo H; Yan H; Yamabe D; Chiba Y; Oikawa R; Nishida N; Chen X; Sakai T; Doita M
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e835-e843. PubMed ID: 35605942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Segmental stability and compressive strength of posterior lumbar interbody fusion implants.
    Tsantrizos A; Baramki HG; Zeidman S; Steffen T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Aug; 25(15):1899-907. PubMed ID: 10908932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro study of biomechanical behavior of anterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody instrumentation techniques.
    Niemeyer TK; Koriller M; Claes L; Kettler A; Werner K; Wilke HJ
    Neurosurgery; 2006 Dec; 59(6):1271-6; discussion 1276-7. PubMed ID: 17277690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel lumbosacral axial fixation device.
    Ledet EH; Tymeson MP; Salerno S; Carl AL; Cragg A
    J Biomech Eng; 2005 Nov; 127(6):929-33. PubMed ID: 16438229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Properties of an interspinous fixation device (ISD) in lumbar fusion constructs: a biomechanical study.
    Techy F; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):572-9. PubMed ID: 23498926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical evaluation of different asymmetrical posterior stabilization methods for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Schleicher P; Beth P; Ottenbacher A; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Schnake KJ; Haas NP; Kandziora F
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2008 Oct; 9(4):363-71. PubMed ID: 18939923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Would an anatomically shaped lumbar interbody cage provide better stability? An in vitro cadaveric biomechanical evaluation.
    Tsitsopoulos PP; Serhan H; Voronov LI; Carandang G; Havey RM; Ghanayem AJ; Patwardhan AG
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Dec; 25(8):E240-4. PubMed ID: 22362111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model.
    Mantell M; Cyriac M; Haines CM; Gudipally M; O'Brien JR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 26384133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.