These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12090287)

  • 1. Using multiple criteria decision analysis for supporting decisions of solid waste management.
    Cheng S; Chan CW; Huang GH
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2002; 37(6):975-90. PubMed ID: 12090287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of landfill sites using GIS-based MCDA with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets.
    Özkan B; Sarıçiçek İ; Özceylan E
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Dec; 27(34):42908-42932. PubMed ID: 32725564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of Municipal Solid Waste Management: A review.
    Soltani A; Hewage K; Reza B; Sadiq R
    Waste Manag; 2015 Jan; 35():318-28. PubMed ID: 25301545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of TOPSIS and VIKOR improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model.
    Aghajani Mir M; Taherei Ghazvinei P; Sulaiman NM; Basri NE; Saheri S; Mahmood NZ; Jahan A; Begum RA; Aghamohammadi N
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 166():109-15. PubMed ID: 26496840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. GIS-based multicriteria municipal solid waste landfill suitability analysis: a review of the methodologies performed and criteria implemented.
    Demesouka OE; Vavatsikos AP; Anagnostopoulos KP
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Apr; 32(4):270-96. PubMed ID: 24626794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
    Onüt S; Soner S
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial and multi-criteria decision analysis-based methodology for landfill site selection in growing urban regions.
    Ersoy H; Bulut F
    Waste Manag Res; 2009 Aug; 27(5):489-500. PubMed ID: 19423606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using MCDA and GIS for hazardous waste landfill siting considering land scarcity for waste disposal.
    De Feo G; De Gisi S
    Waste Manag; 2014 Nov; 34(11):2225-38. PubMed ID: 25002369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hazardous waste landfill site selection in Western Ghana: An integration of multi-criteria decision analysis and geographic information system.
    Stemn E; Kumi-Boateng B
    Waste Manag Res; 2019 Jul; 37(7):723-736. PubMed ID: 31210095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prevention of landfill pollution by multicriteria spatial decision support systems (MC-SDSS): development, implementation, and case study.
    Khoshand A; Bafrani AH; Zahedipour M; Mirbagheri SA; Ehtehsami M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Mar; 25(9):8415-8431. PubMed ID: 29307066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multi-criteria decision aid approach for the selection of the best compromise management scheme for ELVs: the case of Cyprus.
    Mergias I; Moustakas K; Papadopoulos A; Loizidou M
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Aug; 147(3):706-17. PubMed ID: 17324504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using multi-criteria decision making for selection of the optimal strategy for municipal solid waste management.
    Jovanovic S; Savic S; Jovicic N; Boskovic G; Djordjevic Z
    Waste Manag Res; 2016 Sep; 34(9):884-95. PubMed ID: 27354012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decision support models for solid waste management: review and game-theoretic approaches.
    Karmperis AC; Aravossis K; Tatsiopoulos IP; Sotirchos A
    Waste Manag; 2013 May; 33(5):1290-301. PubMed ID: 23462269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New approach for selecting a suitable recycling collection program for recovered paper and pulp recyclables using AHP-TOPSIS techniques.
    Bafail OA; Abdulaal RM
    Waste Manag Res; 2021 Nov; 39(11):1406-1413. PubMed ID: 33759660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interval-parameter semi-infinite fuzzy-stochastic mixed-integer programming approach for environmental management under multiple uncertainties.
    Guo P; Huang GH
    Waste Manag; 2010 Mar; 30(3):521-31. PubMed ID: 19854040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impacts of decision uncertainty on municipal solid waste management.
    Soltani A; Sadiq R; Hewage K
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 197():305-315. PubMed ID: 28402913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sustainable waste disposal technology selection: The stratified best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method.
    Torkayesh AE; Malmir B; Rajabi Asadabadi M
    Waste Manag; 2021 Mar; 122():100-112. PubMed ID: 33508530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An environmentally sustainable decision model for urban solid waste management.
    Costi P; Minciardi R; Robba M; Rovatti M; Sacile R
    Waste Manag; 2004; 24(3):277-95. PubMed ID: 15016417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrating multi-criteria decision analysis for a GIS-based hazardous waste landfill sitting in Kurdistan Province, western Iran.
    Sharifi M; Hadidi M; Vessali E; Mosstafakhani P; Taheri K; Shahoie S; Khodamoradpour M
    Waste Manag; 2009 Oct; 29(10):2740-58. PubMed ID: 19477110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of health-care waste disposal methods using a VIKOR-based fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method.
    Liu HC; Wu J; Li P
    Waste Manag; 2013 Dec; 33(12):2744-51. PubMed ID: 24011433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.