BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12090424)

  • 1. Quantifying the value of in-house consultation in surgical pathology.
    Renshaw AA; Pinnar NE; Jiroutek MR; Young ML
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 May; 117(5):751-4. PubMed ID: 12090424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: clinical consequences of major disagreements.
    Manion E; Cohen MB; Weydert J
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 May; 32(5):732-7. PubMed ID: 18360282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mandatory second opinion surgical pathology at a large referral hospital.
    Kronz JD; Westra WH; Epstein JI
    Cancer; 1999 Dec; 86(11):2426-35. PubMed ID: 10590387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring the value of review of pathology material by a second pathologist.
    Renshaw AA; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 May; 125(5):737-9. PubMed ID: 16707375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interinstitutional comparison of frozen section consultation in small hospitals: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 18,532 frozen section consultation diagnoses in 233 small hospitals.
    Novis DA; Gephardt GN; Zarbo RJ;
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Dec; 120(12):1087-93. PubMed ID: 15456172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of interinstitution anatomic pathology consultation on patient care.
    Abt AB; Abt LG; Olt GJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Jun; 119(6):514-7. PubMed ID: 7605166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In-house daily consensus conference: an important quality control/quality assurance activity--experience at a major referral center.
    Khurshid A; Ahmad Z; Qureshi A
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2009; 52(3):325-7. PubMed ID: 19679952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Virtual slide telepathology for an academic teaching hospital surgical pathology quality assurance program.
    Graham AR; Bhattacharyya AK; Scott KM; Lian F; Grasso LL; Richter LC; Carpenter JB; Chiang S; Henderson JT; Lopez AM; Barker GP; Weinstein RS
    Hum Pathol; 2009 Aug; 40(8):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19540562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The development and testing of a laboratory information system-driven tool for pre-sign-out quality assurance of random surgical pathology reports.
    Owens SR; Dhir R; Yousem SA; Kelly SM; Piccoli A; Wiehagen L; Lassige K; Parwani AV
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 133(6):836-41. PubMed ID: 20472840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intraoperative consultation in gynecologic pathology.
    Acs G
    Semin Diagn Pathol; 2002 Nov; 19(4):237-54. PubMed ID: 12469791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical pathology sign-out. Routine review of every case by a second pathologist.
    Safrin RE; Bark CJ
    Am J Surg Pathol; 1993 Nov; 17(11):1190-2. PubMed ID: 8214266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An audit of intraoperative frozen section in Johor.
    Khoo JJ
    Med J Malaysia; 2004 Mar; 59(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 15535336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of second opinion surgical pathology on the practice of head and neck surgery: a decade experience at a large referral hospital.
    Westra WH; Kronz JD; Eisele DW
    Head Neck; 2002 Jul; 24(7):684-93. PubMed ID: 12112543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraoperative consultation/final diagnosis correlation: relationship to tissue type and pathologic process.
    White VA; Trotter MJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 Jan; 132(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 18181670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Quality assurance of pathology laboratory, standardization of surgical pathology report and consultation: recent trend].
    Namiki T
    Rinsho Byori; 1994 Sep; 42(9):897-901. PubMed ID: 7967111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Directed peer review in surgical pathology.
    Smith ML; Raab SS
    Adv Anat Pathol; 2012 Sep; 19(5):331-7. PubMed ID: 22885382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frozen section diagnosis: accuracy and errors; uses and abuses.
    Saltzstein SL; Nahum AM
    Laryngoscope; 1973 Jul; 83(7):1128-43. PubMed ID: 4719359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Agreement and error rates using blinded review to evaluate surgical pathology of biopsy material.
    Renshaw AA; Cartagena N; Granter SR; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jun; 119(6):797-800. PubMed ID: 12817425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section in diagnosis of ovarian tumors.
    Wootipoom V; Dechsukhum C; Hanprasertpong J; Lim A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 May; 89(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 16756039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increasing agreement over time in interlaboratory anatomic pathology consultation material.
    Renshaw AA; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Aug; 140(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 23897257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.