These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12090636)

  • 1. MEM and Nott dynamic retinoscopy in patients with disorders of vergence and accommodation.
    García A; Cacho P
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2002 May; 22(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 12090636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between MEM and Nott dynamic retinoscopy.
    del Pilar Cacho M; García-Muñoz A; García-Bernabeu JR; López A
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Sep; 76(9):650-5. PubMed ID: 10498007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intra-examiner repeatability and agreement in accommodative response measurements.
    Antona B; Sanchez I; Barrio A; Barra F; Gonzalez E
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Nov; 29(6):606-14. PubMed ID: 19663924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accommodative accuracy by retinoscopy versus autorefraction spherical equivalent or horizontal meridian power.
    Nguyen AT; Wayne JL; Ravikumar A; Manny RE; Anderson HA
    Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Nov; 101(6):778-785. PubMed ID: 29575034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accommodative lag by autorefraction and two dynamic retinoscopy methods.
    ; Manny RE; Chandler DL; Scheiman MM; Gwiazda JE; Cotter SA; Everett DF; Holmes JM; Hyman LG; Kulp MT; Lyon DW; Marsh-Tootle W; Matta N; Melia BM; Norton TT; Repka MX; Silbert DI; Weissberg EM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 19214130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison study of dynamic retinoscopy techniques.
    Locke LC; Somers W
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Aug; 66(8):540-4. PubMed ID: 2771345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparisons of dynamic retinoscopy measurements with a print card, a video display terminal, and a PRIO System Tester as test targets.
    Penisten DK; Goss DA; Philpott G; Pham A; West RW
    Optometry; 2004 Apr; 75(4):231-40. PubMed ID: 15117056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accommodative lag using dynamic retinoscopy: age norms for school-age children.
    McClelland JF; Saunders KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Dec; 81(12):929-33. PubMed ID: 15592117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variation and correlation of clinical tests of accommodative function in a sample of school-age children.
    Jackson TW; Goss DA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Nov; 62(11):857-66. PubMed ID: 1813515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between MEM and Nott dynamic retinoscopy.
    Tassinari J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Mar; 77(3):119-20. PubMed ID: 10772227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of infant accommodation using retinoscopy and photoretinoscopy.
    Gabriel GM; Mutti DO
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):208-15. PubMed ID: 19165126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modified bell retinoscopy: measuring accommodative lag in children.
    Tarczy-Hornoch K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Dec; 86(12):1337-45. PubMed ID: 19797992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of the monocular estimate method of dynamic retinoscopy.
    Rouse MW; London R; Allen DC
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1982 Mar; 59(3):234-9. PubMed ID: 7072827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accommodative response/stimulus by dynamic retinoscopy: near add guidelines.
    Goss DA; Rana S; Ramolia J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 89(10):1497-506. PubMed ID: 22940782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A normative study of the accommodative lag in elementary school children.
    Rouse MW; Hutter RF; Shiftlett R
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1984 Nov; 61(11):693-7. PubMed ID: 6517127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accommodative response under monocular and binocular conditions as a function of phoria in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.
    Momeni-Moghaddam H; Goss DA; Sobhani M
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Jan; 97(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 23808381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical method for measuring adaptation of tonic accommodation and vergence accommodation.
    Tsuetaki TK; Schor CM
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1987 Jun; 64(6):437-49. PubMed ID: 3631200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of target distance on accommodative amplitude measured using the minus lens technique.
    Momeni-Moghaddam H; Wolffsohn JS; Azimi A; Babaei-Malekkolaei E
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Jan; 97(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 23889500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monocular estimate method retinoscopy: central tendency measures and relationship to refractive status and heterophoria.
    Tassinari JT
    Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Nov; 79(11):708-14. PubMed ID: 12462539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic signs of accommodative insufficiency.
    Cacho P; García A; Lara F; Seguí MM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Sep; 79(9):614-20. PubMed ID: 12322932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.