These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12090943)

  • 1. Self-control and impulsiveness with asynchronous presentation of reinforcement schedules.
    Ishii T; Sakagami T
    Behav Processes; 2002 Jul; 59(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 12090943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of delays and ratio requirements in self-control choice.
    Grossbard CL; Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 May; 45(3):305-15. PubMed ID: 3711777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preference reversal between impulsive and self-control choice.
    Beeby E; White KG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 May; 99(3):260-76. PubMed ID: 23440893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tests of transitivity in choices between fixed and variable reinforcer delays.
    Mazur JE; Coe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 May; 47(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 3612019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity to pre- and post-reinforcer delays in self-control choice.
    Yamaguchi T; Saeki D; Ito M
    Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():8-12. PubMed ID: 26456039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Choices between segmented and unsegmented schedules and the self-control paradigm.
    Alessandri J; Lattal KA; Fantino E
    Behav Processes; 2013 Mar; 94():26-31. PubMed ID: 23206903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The pharmacology of impulsive behaviour in rats VI: the effects of ethanol and selective serotonergic drugs on response choice with varying delays of reinforcement.
    Evenden JL; Ryan CN
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1999 Oct; 146(4):413-21. PubMed ID: 10550491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
    Beeby E; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):204-222. PubMed ID: 28758210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pausing as an operant: choice and discriminated responding.
    Craig AR; Lattal KA; Hall EG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Mar; 101(2):230-45. PubMed ID: 24436113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Humans' choice in a self-control choice situation: sensitivity to reinforcer amount, reinforcer delay, and overall reinforcement density.
    Ito M; Nakamura K
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Jan; 69(1):87-102. PubMed ID: 9465415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigations of timing during the schedule and reinforcement intervals with wheel-running reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Christie-Fougere MM
    Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 16844324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determinants of pigeons' choices in token-based self-control procedures.
    Hackenberg TD; Vaidya M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Mar; 79(2):207-18. PubMed ID: 12822687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reinforcer magnitude affects delay discounting and influences effects of d-amphetamine in rats.
    Krebs CA; Reilly WJ; Anderson KG
    Behav Processes; 2016 Sep; 130():39-45. PubMed ID: 27418423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reinforcement schedules: Retroactive and proactive effects of reinforcers inserted into fixed-interval performances.
    Catania AC; Sagvolden T; Keller KJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Jan; 49(1):49-73. PubMed ID: 16812532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Molar optimization versus delayed reinforcement as explanations of choice between fixed-ratio and progressive-ratio schedules.
    Mazur JE; Vaughan W
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Sep; 48(2):251-61. PubMed ID: 3681185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative analyses of methamphetamine's effects on self-control choices: implications for elucidating behavioral mechanisms of drug action.
    Pitts RC; Febbo SM
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):213-33. PubMed ID: 15157974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of reinforcer magnitude on responding under differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedules of rats and pigeons.
    Doughty AH; Richards JB
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Jul; 78(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 12144310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Soft commitment: self-control achieved by response persistence.
    Siegel E; Rachlin H
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Sep; 64(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 7561671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of intertrial reinforcers on self-control choice.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Jan; 61(1):83-96. PubMed ID: 8126393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of social context, reinforcer probability, and reinforcer magnitude on humans' choices to compete or not to compete.
    Dougherty DM; Cherek DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Jul; 62(1):133-48. PubMed ID: 8064209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.