These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12091950)

  • 1. Should we genetically engineer hogs?
    Comstock G
    Between Species; 1992; 8(4):196-202. PubMed ID: 12091950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is it morally permissible to manipulate the genome of domestic hogs?
    Blatz CV
    J Agric Ethics; 1991; 4(2):166-76. PubMed ID: 11652057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response: of pigs and primitive notions.
    Detmer D
    Between Species; 1992; 8(4):203-8. PubMed ID: 12091951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. We should not manipulate the genome of domestic hogs.
    Sapontzis SF
    J Agric Ethics; 1991; 4(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 11652058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dolly: a new form of transgenic breedwealth.
    Franklin S
    Environ Values; 1997 Nov; 6(4):427-37. PubMed ID: 11656688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Altered animals need watchdog to protect them.
    Coghlan A
    New Sci; 1995 Mar; 145(1968):12. PubMed ID: 11656407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetically modified animals: ethical issues.
    Thompson PB
    J Anim Sci; 1993; 71(Suppl. 3):51-6. PubMed ID: 11653153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guess what's coming to dinner?
    Vines G
    New Sci; 1992 Nov; 136(1847):13-4. PubMed ID: 11656186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward a general theory of constitutional personhood: a theory of constitutional personhood for transgenic humanoid species.
    Rivard MD
    UCLA Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 39(5):1425-510. PubMed ID: 11652110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The concept of intrinsic value and transgenic animals.
    Verhoog H
    J Agric Ethics; 1992; 5(2):147-60. PubMed ID: 11651420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Have a heart: xenotransplantation, nonhuman death and human distress.
    Woods T
    Soc Anim; 1998; 6(1):47-65. PubMed ID: 11657526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Research with transgenic animals: obligations and issues.
    Comstock G
    J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 2(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 11657638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the genetic manipulation of animals.
    Pluhar E
    Between Species; 1985; 1(3):13-8. PubMed ID: 12091947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The ethics of patenting higher life forms.
    Hoffmaster B
    Intellect Prop J; 1988; 4():1-24. PubMed ID: 11652586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genes, patents and insurance.
    Stevenson P
    Nature; 1996 Feb; 379(6567):672. PubMed ID: 8602208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intellectual property in higher life forms: the patent system and controversial technologies.
    Merges RP
    MD Law Rev; 1988; 47(4):1051-75. PubMed ID: 16514761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are there limits to animal transgenesis?
    de Pomerai DI
    Eur J Genet Soc; 1997; 3(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11657125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Suffering of the lambs.
    Gordon M
    New Sci; 1997 Apr; 154(2079):16-7. PubMed ID: 11656635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is genetic engineering wrong, per se?
    Burgess JA; Walsh AJ
    J Value Inq; 1998 Sep; 32(3):393-406. PubMed ID: 15295852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biologists mobilize against anti-genetics referendum.
    Koenig R
    Science; 1997 Jan; 275(5300):607-8. PubMed ID: 9019813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.