271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12092991)
21. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer.
Sfondrini MF; Cacciafesta V; Pistorio A; Sfondrini G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11174537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Bonding over Dentin Replacement Materials.
Meraji N; Camilleri J
J Endod; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1343-1349. PubMed ID: 28662878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite.
Wilson RM; Donly KJ
Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 11447960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Bond strengths of glass ionomer restoratives to primary vs permanent dentin.
Thean HP; Mok BY; Chew CL
ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(2):112-6, 82. PubMed ID: 10826046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Orthodontic bracket bonding with a plasma-arc light and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement.
Ishikawa H; Komori A; Kojima I; Ando F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jul; 120(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 11455379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Shear bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin: effect of smear layer thickness and different dentin conditioners.
El-Askary FS; Nassif MS; Fawzy AS
J Adhes Dent; 2008 Dec; 10(6):471-9. PubMed ID: 19189678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Oral Function Improves Interfacial Integrity and Sealing Ability Between Conventional Glass Ionomer Cements and Dentin.
Toledano M; Osorio R; Cabello I; Osorio E; Toledano-Osorio M; Aguilera FS
Microsc Microanal; 2017 Feb; 23(1):131-144. PubMed ID: 28148310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Variable polymerisation shrinkage and the interfacial micropermeability of a dentin bonding system.
Griffiths BM; Naasan M; Sherriff M; Watson TF
J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 11725677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials using a no-rinse conditioner.
Suihkonen RW; Vandewalle KS; Dossett JM
Gen Dent; 2012; 60(6):e413-7. PubMed ID: 23220322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Video rate confocal microscopic imaging of dentin/adhesive interfacial failure under load.
Griffiths BM; Watson TF; Pagliari DE; Pilecki P; Sherriff M
Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):271-9. PubMed ID: 11764115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fracture toughness ov conventional or photopolymerized glass ionomer/dentin interfaces.
Tam LE; Dev S; Pilliar RM
Oper Dent; 1995; 20(4):144-50. PubMed ID: 8700782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of fluorosis on shear bond strength of glass ionomer-based restorative materials to dentin.
Awliya WY; Akpata ES
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Mar; 81(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 10050116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of remaining dentin thickness and the use of conditioner on micro-tensile bond strength of a glass-ionomer adhesive.
Inoue S; Van Meerbeek B; Abe Y; Yoshida Y; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G; Sano H
Dent Mater; 2001 Sep; 17(5):445-55. PubMed ID: 11445212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Glass ionomer cements as luting agents for orthodontic brackets.
Coups-Smith KS; Rossouw PE; Titley KC
Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 12940565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Bond strengths of composite resin and compomers in primary and permanent teeth.
Jumlongras D; White GE
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 9484131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Towards a better understanding of the adhesion mechanism of resin-modified glass-ionomers by bonding to differently prepared dentin.
Cardoso MV; Delmé KI; Mine A; Neves Ade A; Coutinho E; De Moor RJ; Van Meerbeek B
J Dent; 2010 Nov; 38(11):921-9. PubMed ID: 20728505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results.
Folwaczny M; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 11572293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of subject age on the microtensile bond strengths of a resin and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive to tooth structure.
Brackett WW; Tay FR; Looney SW; Ito S; Haisch LD; Pashley DH
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 18505218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
