These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. A comparison of three methods of assessing inter-observer variation applied to measurement of the symphysis-fundal height. Bailey SM; Sarmandal P; Grant JM Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Nov; 96(11):1266-71. PubMed ID: 2611167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of three methods of assessing inter-observer variation applied to ultrasonic fetal measurement in the third trimester. Sarmandal P; Bailey SM; Grant JM Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Nov; 96(11):1261-5. PubMed ID: 2692697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Observer variation in the diagnosis of thyroid disorders. Criteria for and impact on diagnostic decision-making. Jarløv AE Dan Med Bull; 2000 Nov; 47(5):328-39. PubMed ID: 11155660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of methods for calculating a stratified kappa. Barlow W; Lai MY; Azen SP Stat Med; 1991 Sep; 10(9):1465-72. PubMed ID: 1925174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating equations for kappa statistics. Thompson JR Stat Med; 2001 Oct; 20(19):2895-906. PubMed ID: 11568947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accessible calculation of multirater kappa statistics for pathologists. Venkataraman G; Ananthanarayanan V; Paner GP Virchows Arch; 2006 Aug; 449(2):272. PubMed ID: 16673120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [A robust statistic AC₁ for assessing inter-observer agreement in reliability studies]. Nishiura H Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Nov; 66(11):1485-91. PubMed ID: 21099180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Re: "Interrater reliability: completing the methods description in medical records review studies". Sheikh K Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Nov; 162(9):919; author reply 919-20. PubMed ID: 16150889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The statistical analysis of kappa statistics in multiple samples. Donner A; Klar N J Clin Epidemiol; 1996 Sep; 49(9):1053-8. PubMed ID: 8780616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interrater Agreement on the Visual Analysis of Individual Tiers and Functional Relations in Multiple Baseline Designs. Wolfe K; Seaman MA; Drasgow E Behav Modif; 2016 Nov; 40(6):852-873. PubMed ID: 27103183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Graphical aids for visualizing and interpreting patterns in departures from agreement in ordinal categorical observer agreement data. Bangdiwala SI J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(5):773-783. PubMed ID: 28010186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparing multiple groups with continuous data -one-way analysis of variance]. Nishimoto N Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Nov; 69(11):1320-30. PubMed ID: 24256658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Modelling observer agreement--an alternative to kappa. May SM J Clin Epidemiol; 1994 Nov; 47(11):1315-24. PubMed ID: 7722568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A quantitative model using mean and standard deviation for evaluation of interobserver agreement in nuclear atypia scoring of breast carcinomas in a protocol study. Tsuda H; Akiyama F; Kurosumi M; Sakamoto G; Watanabe T Pathol Int; 2000 Feb; 50(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 10792770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simultaneous estimation of intrarater and interrater agreement for multiple raters under order restrictions for a binary trait. Lester Kirchner H; Lemke JH Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(12):1761-72. PubMed ID: 12111910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]