BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12094097)

  • 1. Estimating the conditional false-positive rate for semi-latent data.
    van der Merwe L; Maritz JS
    Epidemiology; 2002 Jul; 13(4):424-30. PubMed ID: 12094097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of test sensitivity and specificity when disease confirmation is limited to positive results.
    Walter SD
    Epidemiology; 1999 Jan; 10(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 9888282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian estimation of diagnostic tests accuracy for semi-latent data with covariates.
    Martinez EZ; Achcar JA; Louzada-Neto F
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):809-21. PubMed ID: 16078387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests using latent class models that account for conditional dependence between tests: a simulation study.
    Keddie SH; Baerenbold O; Keogh RH; Bradley J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Mar; 23(1):58. PubMed ID: 36894883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of diagnostic tests without gold standards.
    Hui SL; Zhou XH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1998 Dec; 7(4):354-70. PubMed ID: 9871952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of disease prevalence, true positive rate, and false positive rate of two screening tests when disease verification is applied on only screen-positives: a hierarchical model using multi-center data.
    Stock EM; Stamey JD; Sankaranarayanan R; Young DM; Muwonge R; Arbyn M
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 36(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 21856264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing dichotomous screening tests when individuals negative on both tests are not verified.
    Chock C; Irwig L; Berry G; Glasziou P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1997 Nov; 50(11):1211-7. PubMed ID: 9393377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Off Bayes: effect of verification bias on posterior probabilities calculated using Bayes' theorem.
    Diamond GA
    Med Decis Making; 1992; 12(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 1538629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance.
    Pepe MS; Janes H
    Biostatistics; 2007 Apr; 8(2):474-84. PubMed ID: 17085745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the accuracy of two tests with a confirmatory procedure limited to positive results.
    Cheng H; Macaluso M
    Epidemiology; 1997 Jan; 8(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 9116081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian estimation of disease prevalence and the parameters of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard.
    Joseph L; Gyorkos TW; Coupal L
    Am J Epidemiol; 1995 Feb; 141(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 7840100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating p-values in small microarray experiments.
    Yang H; Churchill G
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 17077100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian techniques for comparison of the test performance of PCR and culture for the identification of Campylobacter in enriched comminuted chicken samples.
    Ebel ED; Williams MS; Golden NJ; Tankson J
    J Appl Microbiol; 2016 May; 120(5):1418-26. PubMed ID: 26895234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian hierarchical latent class models for estimating diagnostic accuracy.
    Wang C; Lin X; Nelson KP
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):1112-1128. PubMed ID: 31146651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayes' theorem and diagnostic tests in neuropsychology: interval estimates for post-test probabilities.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Betkowska K
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 May; 23(4):624-44. PubMed ID: 19235634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Random effects models in latent class analysis for evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests.
    Qu Y; Tan M; Kutner MH
    Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):797-810. PubMed ID: 8805757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A general latent class model for performance evaluation of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard: an application to Chagas disease.
    de Araujo Pereira G; Louzada F; de Fátima Barbosa V; Ferreira-Silva MM; Moraes-Souza H
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2012; 2012():487502. PubMed ID: 22919430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Roaming through methodology. XXXII. False test results].
    van der Weijden T; van den Akker M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 May; 145(19):906-8. PubMed ID: 11387865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating measures of diagnostic accuracy when some covariate information is missing.
    Paliwal P; Gelfand AE
    Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(17):2981-93. PubMed ID: 16345056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Bayesian statistic: an approach fitted to clinic].
    Meyer N; Vinzio S; Goichot B
    Rev Med Interne; 2009 Mar; 30(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 18757117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.