These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12096078)

  • 41. Canadian Family Physician's new ethics guidelines.
    Reid T
    Can Fam Physician; 2002 Feb; 48():238-40, 250-3. PubMed ID: 11889879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism: the unholy trinity of scientific writing.
    Zietman AL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Oct; 87(2):225-7. PubMed ID: 23958142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Avoiding unethical writing practices.
    Roig M
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2012 Oct; 50(10):3385-7. PubMed ID: 22750724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Peer-reviewed publication: a view from inside.
    Fisher RS; Powers LE
    Epilepsia; 2004 Aug; 45(8):889-94. PubMed ID: 15270753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Will the UK cope?
    Horton R
    Lancet; 1997 Jul; 350(9073):234. PubMed ID: 9242798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Writing: visuals are another story.
    Dominiczak MH; McFall K
    Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6945):128. PubMed ID: 12853927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. What a reviewer wants.
    Davidson AJ; Carlin JB
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Dec; 18(12):1149-56. PubMed ID: 19076567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Writing: LEX and flexibility.
    Brent A
    Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6945):128. PubMed ID: 12853928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Merck Sharpe and Dohme versus Laporte.
    Laporte JR
    Lancet; 2004 Jul 31-Aug 6; 364(9432):416. PubMed ID: 15288737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Medical editors to take tougher line.
    Coghlan A
    New Sci; 2004 Mar 6-12; 181(2437):11. PubMed ID: 15139349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Scientific misconduct. Bell Labs fires star physicist found guilty of forging data.
    Service RF
    Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5591):30-1. PubMed ID: 12364753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Images: to alter or not to alter? The ethics of image modification.
    Kremenak N; Siegel SC
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jan; 17(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 18190411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Scientific Medical Writing in Practice: How to Succeed the Writing Style?
    Ben Saad H
    Tunis Med; 2019 Feb; 97(2):273-285. PubMed ID: 31539084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Fostering integrity in scientific research and publishing.
    Burton GA; Wenning RJ
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):560-561. PubMed ID: 28613026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Reporting standards and the transparency of trials.
    Levin A
    Ann Intern Med; 2001 Jan; 134(2):169-72. PubMed ID: 11177328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Psychology research. Psychology's bold initiative.
    Carpenter S
    Science; 2012 Mar; 335(6076):1558-61. PubMed ID: 22461583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. COPE guidelines on good publication practice. Committee on Publication Ethics.
    Cockcroft A
    Occup Environ Med; 2000 Aug; 57(8):505. PubMed ID: 10896955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Bad peer reviewers.
    Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):93. PubMed ID: 11557930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
    Jones R
    Fam Pract; 2004 Feb; 21(1):3. PubMed ID: 14760035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Ethical issues in the reporting of clinical trials.
    Djulbegovic B; Clarke M
    JAMA; 2001 Oct; 286(13):1577-8. PubMed ID: 11585477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.