These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12096578)

  • 21. Digital photography in wound care.
    Hayes S; Dodds S
    Nurs Times; 2003 Oct 21-27; 99(42):48-9. PubMed ID: 14618990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Recording wounds: Polaroid's new medically-designed cameras.
    Clarke G
    Br J Community Nurs; 2000 Nov; 5(11):578-80. PubMed ID: 12066058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Photographic evidence protocol: the use of digital imaging methods to rectify angular distortion and create life size reproductions of bite mark evidence.
    Bowers CM; Johansen RJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Jan; 47(1):178-85. PubMed ID: 12064648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Digital photography for the light microscope: results with a gated, video-rate CCD camera and NIH-image software.
    Shaw SL; Salmon ED; Quatrano RS
    Biotechniques; 1995 Dec; 19(6):946-55. PubMed ID: 8747661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Verge Videometer wound measurement package.
    Williams C
    Br J Nurs; 2000 Feb 24-Mar 8; 9(4):237-9. PubMed ID: 11033643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of a portable fundus camera for use in the teleophthalmologic diagnosis of glaucoma.
    Yogesan K; Constable IJ; Barry CJ; Eikelboom RH; Morgan W; Tay-Kearney ML; Jitskaia L
    J Glaucoma; 1999 Oct; 8(5):297-301. PubMed ID: 10529928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Wound areas by computerized planimetry of digital images: accuracy and reliability.
    Mayrovitz HN; Soontupe LB
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 May; 22(5):222-9. PubMed ID: 19521289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Collaboration in wound photography competency development: a unique approach.
    Bradshaw LM; Gergar ME; Holko GA
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2011 Feb; 24(2):85-92; quiz 93-4. PubMed ID: 21220994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Wound debridement: Comparative reliability of three methods for measuring fibrin percentage in chronic wounds.
    Laplaud AL; Blaizot X; Gaillard C; Morice A; Lebreuilly I; Clément C; Parienti JJ; Dompmartin A
    Wound Repair Regen; 2010; 18(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 20082676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Standardization of wound photography using the Wound Electronic Medical Record.
    Rennert R; Golinko M; Kaplan D; Flattau A; Brem H
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 Jan; 22(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 19096283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The application of digital photography with retroillumination for lens in cataract study].
    Li JJ; Xu L; Sun BC; Chen YJ; Ma K
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2003 May; 39(5):278-82. PubMed ID: 12892603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of a digital retinal imaging system and seven-field stereo color fundus photography to detect diabetic retinopathy in the primary care environment.
    Schiffman RM; Jacobsen G; Nussbaum JJ; Desai UR; Carey JD; Glasser D; Zimmer-Galler IE; Zeimer R; Goldberg MF
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 15688971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Early diagnosis of acromegaly: computers vs clinicians.
    Miller RE; Learned-Miller EG; Trainer P; Paisley A; Blanz V
    Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 2011 Aug; 75(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 21521289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The reliability of digital imaging in the remote assessment of wounds: defining a standard.
    Murphy RX; Bain MA; Wasser TE; Wilson E; Okunski WJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Apr; 56(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 16557079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Image analysis of chronic wounds for determining the surface area.
    Papazoglou ES; Zubkov L; Mao X; Neidrauer M; Rannou N; Weingarten MS
    Wound Repair Regen; 2010; 18(4):349-58. PubMed ID: 20492631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of wound area measurement techniques: visitrak versus photography.
    Chang AC; Dearman B; Greenwood JE
    Eplasty; 2011 Apr; 11():e18. PubMed ID: 21559060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Measuring wound length, width, and area: which technique?
    Langemo D; Anderson J; Hanson D; Hunter S; Thompson P
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Jan; 21(1):42-5; quiz 45-7. PubMed ID: 18156829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Thirty-five millimeter versus digital photography: comparison of photographic quality and clinical evaluation.
    Wall S; Kazahaya K; Becker SS; Becker DG
    Facial Plast Surg; 1999; 15(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 11816120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [3-dimensional documentation of wound-healing].
    Körber A; Grabbe S; Dissemond J
    Zentralbl Chir; 2006 Apr; 131 Suppl 1():S174-6. PubMed ID: 16575675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. High-resolution ultrasound reflex transmission imaging and digital photography: potential tools for the quantitative assessment of pigmented lesions.
    Rallan D; Dickson M; Bush NL; Harland CC; Mortimer P; Bamber JC
    Skin Res Technol; 2006 Feb; 12(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 16420539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.