345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12096580)
1. Cost-effectiveness of wound management in France: pressure ulcers and venous leg ulcers.
Meaume S; Gemmen E
J Wound Care; 2002 Jun; 11(6):219-24. PubMed ID: 12096580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The cost-effectiveness of wound management protocols of care.
Harding K; Cutting K; Price P
Br J Nurs; 2000 Oct; 9(19 Suppl):S6, S8, S10 passim. PubMed ID: 12271239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison of the effectiveness and cost of treatment with humid environment as compared to traditional cure. Clinical trial on primary care patients with venous leg ulcers and pressure ulcers].
Capillas Pérez R; Cabré Aguilar V; Gil Colomé AM; Gaitano García A; Torra i Bou JE
Rev Enferm; 2000 Jan; 23(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 10788945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Management of venous leg ulcer by French physicians, diversity and related costs: a prospective medicoeconomic observational study].
Lévy E; Lévy P
J Mal Vasc; 2001 Feb; 26(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 11240528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Economic evaluation of the treatment of chronic wounds: hydroactive wound dressings in combination with enzymatic ointment versus gauze dressings in patients with pressure ulcer and venous leg ulcer in Germany.
Bergemann R; Lauterbach KW; Vanscheidt W; Neander KD; Engst R
Pharmacoeconomics; 1999 Oct; 16(4):367-77. PubMed ID: 10623365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of three adjunct cellular/tissue-derived products used in the management of chronic venous leg ulcers.
Carter MJ; Waycaster C; Schaum K; Gilligan AM
Value Health; 2014 Dec; 17(8):801-13. PubMed ID: 25498775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of venous ulcer care: results of a longitudinal study.
Kerstein MD; Gahtan V
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Jun; 46(6):22-6, 28-9. PubMed ID: 11029932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost effectiveness of using carboxymethylcellulose dressing compared with gauze in the management of exuding venous leg ulcers in Germany and the USA.
Guest JF; Ruiz FJ; Mihai A; Lehman A
Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Jan; 21(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 15881478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized clinical trial of honey-impregnated dressings for venous leg ulcers.
Jull A; Walker N; Parag V; Molan P; Rodgers A;
Br J Surg; 2008 Feb; 95(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 18161896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical and economic benefit of enzymatic debridement of pressure ulcers compared to autolytic debridement with a hydrogel dressing.
Waycaster C; Milne CT
J Med Econ; 2013 Jul; 16(7):976-86. PubMed ID: 23701261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hydrocolloid versus saline-gauze dressings in treating pressure ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Xakellis GC; Chrischilles EA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 May; 73(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 1580775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relative cost-effectiveness of a skin protectant in managing venous leg ulcers in the UK.
Guest JF; Taylor RR; Vowden K; Vowden P
J Wound Care; 2012 Aug; 21(8):389-94, 396-8. PubMed ID: 22885312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pressure ulcers--randomised controlled trial comparing hydrocolloid and saline gauze dressings.
Chang KW; Alsagoff S; Ong KT; Sim PH
Med J Malaysia; 1998 Dec; 53(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 10971989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A cost-effectiveness analysis of a hydration response technology dressing in the treatment of venous leg ulcers in the UK.
Walzer S; Dröschel D; Vollmer L; Atkin L; Ousey K
J Wound Care; 2018 Mar; 27(3):166-172. PubMed ID: 29509113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Workload and prevalence of open wounds in the community: French Vulnus initiative.
Meaume S; Kerihuel JC; Fromantin I; Téot L
J Wound Care; 2012 Feb; 21(2):62, 64, 66 passim. PubMed ID: 22584525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost analysis of negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation for wound bed preparation preceding split-thickness skin grafts for massive (>100 cm(2)) chronic venous leg ulcers.
Yang CK; Alcantara S; Goss S; Lantis JC
J Vasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 61(4):995-9. PubMed ID: 25595397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A cost-effectiveness study of leg ulcer treatment in primary care. Comparison of saline-gauze and hydrocolloid treatment in a prospective, randomized study.
Ohlsson P; Larsson K; Lindholm C; Möller M
Scand J Prim Health Care; 1994 Dec; 12(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 7863149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A cost-effectiveness analysis of two community models of care for patients with venous leg ulcers.
Gordon L; Edwards H; Courtney M; Finlayson K; Shuter P; Lindsay E
J Wound Care; 2006 Sep; 15(8):348-53. PubMed ID: 17001943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk factors related to the failure of venous leg ulcers to heal with compression treatment.
Milic DJ; Zivic SS; Bogdanovic DC; Karanovic ND; Golubovic ZV
J Vasc Surg; 2009 May; 49(5):1242-7. PubMed ID: 19233601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of three different compression systems in newly-diagnosed venous leg ulcers in the UK.
Guest JF; Fuller GW; Vowden P
J Wound Care; 2017 May; 26(5):244-254. PubMed ID: 28475441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
