BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12096756)

  • 1. Perceived orientation in physical and virtual environments: changes in perceived orientation as a function of idiothetic information available.
    Lathrop WB; Kaiser MK
    Presence (Camb); 2002 Feb; 11(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 12096756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Designing a successful HMD-based experience.
    Pierce JS; Pausch R; Sturgill CB; Christiansen KD
    Presence (Camb); 1999 Aug; 8(4):469-73. PubMed ID: 11676445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three dimensional spatial memory and learning in real and virtual environments.
    Oman CM; Shebilske WL; Richards JT; Tubre TC; Beall AC; Natapoff A
    Spat Cogn Comput; 2002; 2(4):355-72. PubMed ID: 14983834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Judgments of the distance to nearby virtual objects: interaction of viewing conditions and accommodative demand.
    Ellis SR; Menges BM
    Presence (Camb); 1997 Aug; 6(4):452-60. PubMed ID: 11540610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Desktop VR Is Better Than Non-ambulatory HMD VR for Spatial Learning.
    Srivastava P; Rimzhim A; Vijay P; Singh S; Chandra S
    Front Robot AI; 2019; 6():50. PubMed ID: 33501066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rotation and direction judgment from visual images head-slaved in two and three degrees-of-freedom.
    Adelstein BD; Ellis SR
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum; 2000 Mar; 30(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 11727750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of viewing plane on perceived distances in real and virtual environments.
    Geuss MN; Stefanucci JK; Creem-Regehr SH; Thompson WB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1242-53. PubMed ID: 22409144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A study of orientation in a zero gravity environment by means of virtual reality simulation.
    Aoki H; Yamaguchi T; Ohno R
    J Gravit Physiol; 2000 Jul; 7(2):P93-4. PubMed ID: 12697557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of physical navigation on spatial organization for sensemaking.
    Andrews C; North C
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2013 Dec; 19(12):2207-16. PubMed ID: 24051787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Target cuing in visual search: the effects of conformality and display location on the allocation of visual attention.
    Yeh M; Wickens CD; Seagull FJ
    Hum Factors; 1999 Dec; 41(4):524-42. PubMed ID: 10774124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of three helmet-mounted display symbologies on unusual attitude recognition and recovery.
    Ercoline WR; Self BP; Matthews RS
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2002 Nov; 73(11):1053-8. PubMed ID: 12433226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of the configuration and the interior design of a virtual weightless space station on human spatial orientation.
    Aoki H; Ohno R; Yamaguchi T
    Acta Astronaut; 2005; 56(9-12):1005-16. PubMed ID: 15835059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do the physical characteristics of a virtual reality device contraindicate its use for balance assessment?
    Mihalik JP; Kohli L; Whitton MC
    J Sport Rehabil; 2008 Feb; 17(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 18270385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the cognitive effects of travel technique in complex real and virtual environments.
    Suma EA; Finkelstein SL; Reid M; V Babu S; Ulinski AC; Hodges LF
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2010; 16(4):690-702. PubMed ID: 20467065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial orientation strategies in Morris-type virtual water task for humans.
    Kallai J; Makany T; Karadi K; Jacobs WJ
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 159(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 15817182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Hologram in My Hand: How Effective is Interactive Exploration of 3D Visualizations in Immersive Tangible Augmented Reality?
    Bach B; Sicat R; Beyer J; Cordeil M; Pfister H
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2018 Jan; 24(1):457-467. PubMed ID: 28866590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Display Technology on Perceived Scale of Space.
    Geuss MN; Stefanucci JK; Creem-Regehr SH; Thompson WB; Mohler BJ
    Hum Factors; 2015 Nov; 57(7):1235-47. PubMed ID: 26060237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Climbing With a Head-Mounted Display: Dual-Task Costs.
    Woodham A; Billinghurst M; Helton WS
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):452-61. PubMed ID: 26865416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence against integration of spatial maps in humans: generality across real and virtual environments.
    Sturz BR; Bodily KD; Katz JS; Kelly DM
    Anim Cogn; 2009 Mar; 12(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 18766392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An analysis of control reversal errors during unusual attitude recoveries using helmet-mounted display symbology.
    Liggett KK; Gallimore JJ
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2002 Feb; 73(2):102-11. PubMed ID: 11846178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.