These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12098173)

  • 1. Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED.
    Gallagher EJ; Bijur PE; Latimer C; Silver W
    Am J Emerg Med; 2002 Jul; 20(4):287-90. PubMed ID: 12098173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of a verbally administered numerical rating scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department.
    Bijur PE; Latimer CT; Gallagher EJ
    Acad Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 10(4):390-2. PubMed ID: 12670856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain.
    Bijur PE; Silver W; Gallagher EJ
    Acad Emerg Med; 2001 Dec; 8(12):1153-7. PubMed ID: 11733293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale.
    Gallagher EJ; Liebman M; Bijur PE
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Dec; 38(6):633-8. PubMed ID: 11719741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain?
    Kelly AM
    Acad Emerg Med; 1998 Nov; 5(11):1086-90. PubMed ID: 9835471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determining the minimum clinically significant difference in visual analog pain score for children.
    Powell CV; Kelly AM; Williams A
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Jan; 37(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 11145767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of the visual analog scale in children with acute pain in the emergency department.
    Bailey B; Gravel J; Daoust R
    Pain; 2012 Apr; 153(4):839-842. PubMed ID: 22305630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of the visual analog scale to rate and monitor severity of nausea in the emergency department.
    Meek R; Kelly AM; Hu XF
    Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Dec; 16(12):1304-1310. PubMed ID: 20053251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain.
    Kelly AM
    Emerg Med J; 2001 May; 18(3):205-7. PubMed ID: 11354213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient and physician agreement on abdominal pain severity and need for opioid analgesia.
    Thomas SH; Borczuk P; Shackelford J; Ostrander J; Silver D; Evans M; Stein J
    Am J Emerg Med; 1999 Oct; 17(6):586-90. PubMed ID: 10530541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity.
    Todd KH; Funk KG; Funk JP; Bonacci R
    Ann Emerg Med; 1996 Apr; 27(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 8604867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identifying the minimum clinically significant difference in acute pain in the elderly.
    Bijur PE; Chang AK; Esses D; Gallagher EJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 2010 Nov; 56(5):517-521.e1. PubMed ID: 20303199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinically significant changes in pain along the visual analog scale.
    Bird SB; Dickson EW
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Dec; 38(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 11719742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intravenous sodium valproate versus prochlorperazine for the emergency department treatment of acute migraine headaches: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.
    Tanen DA; Miller S; French T; Riffenburgh RH
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Jun; 41(6):847-53. PubMed ID: 12764341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of the color analog scale: repeatability of scores in traumatic and nontraumatic injuries.
    Bulloch B; Garcia-Filion P; Notricia D; Bryson M; McConahay T
    Acad Emerg Med; 2009 May; 16(5):465-9. PubMed ID: 19388922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia for patients with acute abdominal pain in the emergency department: a randomized trial.
    Birnbaum A; Schechter C; Tufaro V; Touger R; Gallagher EJ; Bijur P
    Acad Emerg Med; 2012 Apr; 19(4):370-7. PubMed ID: 22506940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The end of the line? The Visual Analogue Scale and Verbal Numerical Rating Scale as pain assessment tools in the emergency department.
    Mohan H; Ryan J; Whelan B; Wakai A
    Emerg Med J; 2010 May; 27(5):372-5. PubMed ID: 20442167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability and validity of observer ratings of pain using the visual analog scale (VAS) in infants undergoing immunization injections.
    Taddio A; O'Brien L; Ipp M; Stephens D; Goldbach M; Koren G
    Pain; 2009 Dec; 147(1-3):141-6. PubMed ID: 19767147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of four pain scales in children with acute abdominal pain in a pediatric emergency department.
    Bailey B; Bergeron S; Gravel J; Daoust R
    Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Oct; 50(4):379-83, 383.e1-2. PubMed ID: 17588706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinically significant differences in the visual analog pain scale in acute vasoocclusive sickle cell crisis.
    Lopez BL; Flenders P; Davis-Moon L; Corbin T; Ballas SK
    Hemoglobin; 2007; 31(4):427-32. PubMed ID: 17994376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.