111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12098533)
1. Metric assessment of race from the pelvis in South Africans.
Patriquin ML; Steyn M; Loth SR
Forensic Sci Int; 2002 Jun; 127(1-2):104-13. PubMed ID: 12098533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Metric analysis of sex differences in South African black and white pelves.
Patriquin ML; Steyn M; Loth SR
Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Jan; 147(2-3):119-27. PubMed ID: 15567615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sexually dimorphic pelvic morphology in South African whites and blacks.
Patriquin ML; Loth SR; Steyn M
Homo; 2003; 53(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 12733399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Metric sex determination from the pelvis in modern Greeks.
Steyn M; Işcan MY
Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jul; 179(1):86.e1-6. PubMed ID: 18554832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sexual dimorphism in the crania and mandibles of South African whites.
Steyn M; Işcan MY
Forensic Sci Int; 1998 Nov; 98(1-2):9-16. PubMed ID: 10036755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Osteometric sex determination from the pelvis--does population specificity matter?
Steyn M; Patriquin ML
Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Oct; 191(1-3):113.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19665855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biometric characteristics of the pelvis in female-to-male transsexuals.
Sitek A; Fijałkowska M; Żądzińska E; Antoszewski B
Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Oct; 41(5):1303-13. PubMed ID: 22810992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Greater sciatic notch morphology: sex, age, and population differences.
Walker PL
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2005 Aug; 127(4):385-91. PubMed ID: 15693026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outline analysis of sex and population variation in greater sciatic notch and obturator foramen morphology with implications for sex estimation.
Kilmer K; Garvin H
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Sep; 314():110346. PubMed ID: 32615393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing morphological (
Curto A; Ferro S; Santos C; Lourenço M; Fahy GE; Anselmo D; Fernandes T
Anthropol Anz; 2024 Mar; 81(2):139-151. PubMed ID: 37580945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiographic examination of the greater sciatic notch in determining the sex among Iranian people.
Alizadeh Z; Hosseini A; Abkenari ShA; Jabbari M
Med Sci Law; 2013 Apr; 53(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 23160604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sexual dimorphism and ancestral variation in the pectoral and pelvic girdles of modern humans.
Hudson DR; Langdon JH
Homo; 2023 Apr; 74(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 36628541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Craniometric determination of population affinity in South Africans.
Yaşar Işcan M; Steyn M
Int J Legal Med; 1999; 112(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 10048665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Geometric morphometric analysis of the greater sciatic notch in South Africans.
Steyn M; Pretorius E; Hutten L
Homo; 2004; 54(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 15216665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Age estimation accuracies from black South African os coxae.
Jones M; Gordon G; Brits D
Homo; 2018 Sep; 69(5):248-258. PubMed ID: 30213448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Statistical study of sexual dimorphism in the human fetal sciatic notch.
Holcomb SM; Konigsberg LW
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1995 Jun; 97(2):113-25. PubMed ID: 7653503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Metric and comparative analysis of sexual dimorphism in the Thai femur.
King CA; Işcan MY; Loth SR
J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):954-8. PubMed ID: 9729810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurements of the talus in the assessment of population affinity.
Bidmos MA; Dayal MR; Adegboye OA
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jun; 287():221.e1-221.e7. PubMed ID: 29673758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discriminant function analysis for sex assessment in pelvic girdle bones: sample from the contemporary Mexican population.
Gómez-Valdés JA; Torres Ramírez G; Báez Molgado S; Herrera Sain-Leu P; Castrejón Caballero JL; Sánchez-Mejorada G
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Mar; 56(2):297-301. PubMed ID: 21265837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Craniometric analysis of the modern Cretan population.
Kranioti EF; Işcan MY; Michalodimitrakis M
Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Sep; 180(2-3):110.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18718728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
