These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Mechanical properties of dental luting cements. Li ZC; White SN J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):597-609. PubMed ID: 10220666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of water storage, thermocycling, the incorporation and site of placement of glass-fibers on the flexural strength of veneering composite. Göhring TN; Gallo L; Lüthy H Dent Mater; 2005 Aug; 21(8):761-72. PubMed ID: 15885765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites. Kim KH; Ong JL; Okuno O J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):642-9. PubMed ID: 12131887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of shade and storage time on the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and hardness of composites used for indirect restorations. Cesar PF; Miranda WG; Braga RR J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11552166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Strength and elastic modulus of fiber-reinforced composites used for fabricating FPDs. Nakamura T; Waki T; Kinuta S; Tanaka H Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):549-53. PubMed ID: 14651244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of fiber type and wetting agent on the flexural properties of an indirect fiber reinforced composite. Ellakwa AE; Shortall AC; Marquis PM J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):485-90. PubMed ID: 12473997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Shear punch strength and flexural strength of model composites with varying filler volume fraction, particle size and silanation. Ikejima I; Nomoto R; McCabe JF Dent Mater; 2003 May; 19(3):206-11. PubMed ID: 12628432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short glass fiber-reinforced composite with a semi-interpenetrating polymer network matrix for temporary crowns and bridges. Garoushi SK; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Jan; 9(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 18176644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of the mechanical properties of composites for indirect dental restorations on pattern failure. Klymus ME; Shinkai RS; Mota EG; Oshima HM; Spohr AM; Burnett LH Stomatologija; 2007; 9(2):56-60. PubMed ID: 17637528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of a leucite-containing ceramic filler on the abrasive wear of dental composites. Atai M; Yassini E; Amini M; Watts DC Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1181-7. PubMed ID: 17507087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The physical properties of a machinable resin composite for esthetic restorations. Hamakubo Y; Sawase T; Yoshida K; Kamada K; Taira Y; Atsuta M Dent Mater J; 2005 Mar; 24(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 15881203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A partially aromatic urethane dimethacrylate as a new substitute for Bis-GMA in restorative composites. Moszner N; Fischer UK; Angermann J; Rheinberger V Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):694-9. PubMed ID: 17767952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]