These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12098577)

  • 1. Thermoplastic composites for veneering posterior teeth-a feasibility study.
    Gegauff AG; Garcia JL; Koelling KW; Seghi RR
    Dent Mater; 2002 Sep; 18(6):479-85. PubMed ID: 12098577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical properties of dental luting cements.
    Li ZC; White SN
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):597-609. PubMed ID: 10220666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of water storage, thermocycling, the incorporation and site of placement of glass-fibers on the flexural strength of veneering composite.
    Göhring TN; Gallo L; Lüthy H
    Dent Mater; 2005 Aug; 21(8):761-72. PubMed ID: 15885765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites.
    Kim KH; Ong JL; Okuno O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):642-9. PubMed ID: 12131887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of shade and storage time on the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and hardness of composites used for indirect restorations.
    Cesar PF; Miranda WG; Braga RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11552166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strength and elastic modulus of fiber-reinforced composites used for fabricating FPDs.
    Nakamura T; Waki T; Kinuta S; Tanaka H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):549-53. PubMed ID: 14651244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of fiber type and wetting agent on the flexural properties of an indirect fiber reinforced composite.
    Ellakwa AE; Shortall AC; Marquis PM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):485-90. PubMed ID: 12473997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dental resin composites containing ceramic whiskers and precured glass ionomer particles.
    Xu HH; Eichmiller FC; Antonucci JM; Schumacher GE; Ives LK
    Dent Mater; 2000 Sep; 16(5):356-63. PubMed ID: 10915897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laboratory strength of glass ionomer cement, compomers, and resin composites.
    Piwowarczyk A; Ottl P; Lauer HC; Büchler A
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12087545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shear punch strength and flexural strength of model composites with varying filler volume fraction, particle size and silanation.
    Ikejima I; Nomoto R; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater; 2003 May; 19(3):206-11. PubMed ID: 12628432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short glass fiber-reinforced composite with a semi-interpenetrating polymer network matrix for temporary crowns and bridges.
    Garoushi SK; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Jan; 9(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 18176644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of the mechanical properties of composites for indirect dental restorations on pattern failure.
    Klymus ME; Shinkai RS; Mota EG; Oshima HM; Spohr AM; Burnett LH
    Stomatologija; 2007; 9(2):56-60. PubMed ID: 17637528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of a leucite-containing ceramic filler on the abrasive wear of dental composites.
    Atai M; Yassini E; Amini M; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1181-7. PubMed ID: 17507087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The physical properties of a machinable resin composite for esthetic restorations.
    Hamakubo Y; Sawase T; Yoshida K; Kamada K; Taira Y; Atsuta M
    Dent Mater J; 2005 Mar; 24(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 15881203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A partially aromatic urethane dimethacrylate as a new substitute for Bis-GMA in restorative composites.
    Moszner N; Fischer UK; Angermann J; Rheinberger V
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):694-9. PubMed ID: 17767952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-crystalline ceramic whisker-reinforced carboxylic acid-resin composites with fluoride release.
    Xu HH; Eichmiller FC; Antonucci JM; Flaim GM
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 11203805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of fracture toughness and mechanical properties of ternary thiol-ene-methacrylate systems as resin matrix for dental restorative composites.
    Beigi S; Yeganeh H; Atai M
    Dent Mater; 2013 Jul; 29(7):777-87. PubMed ID: 23702048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of airborne-particle abrasion on mechanical properties and bond strength of carbon/epoxy and glass/bis-GMA fiber-reinforced resin posts.
    Soares CJ; Santana FR; Pereira JC; Araujo TS; Menezes MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 18514666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of veneering composite composition on the efficacy of fiber-reinforced restorations (FRR).
    Ellakwa A; Shortall A; Shehata M; Marquis P
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):467-75. PubMed ID: 11551011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture toughness of posterior resin composites.
    Bonilla ED; Mardirossian G; Caputo AA
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Mar; 32(3):206-10. PubMed ID: 12066660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.