1893 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12099305)
1. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
Giorgi-Guarnieri D; Janofsky J; Keram E; Lawsky S; Merideth P; Mossman D; Schwart-Watts D; Scott C; Thompson J; Zonana H;
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. AAPL Practice Guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial.
Mossman D; Noffsinger SG; Ash P; Frierson RL; Gerbasi J; Hackett M; Lewis CF; Pinals DA; Scott CL; Sieg KG; Wall BW; Zonana HV;
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4 Suppl):S3-72. PubMed ID: 18083992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prearraignment forensic evaluation: the odyssey moves east of the Pecos.
Miller RD
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1990; 18(3):311-21. PubMed ID: 2245246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Mental state and the criminal responsibility--legal regulations and medical criteria in Poland and other countries].
Bolechała F
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2009; 59(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 20860304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
Sayeed SA
Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The psychiatrist's guide to right and wrong: judicial standards of wrongfulness since M'Naghten.
Goldstein RL; Rotter M
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 3069146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The legal basis of forensic psychiatry: statutorily mandated psychiatric diagnoses.
Bloom JD; Rogers JL
Am J Psychiatry; 1987 Jul; 144(7):847-53. PubMed ID: 3605396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The psychiatrist's guide to right and wrong: Part IV: The insanity defense and the Ultimate Issue Rule.
Goldstein RL
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 2790225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impossible dialogue between psychiatry and the judicial system: a language problem.
Zemishlany Z; Melamed Y
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2006; 43(3):150-4; discussion 155-8. PubMed ID: 17294980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Forensic psychiatric expert witnessing within the criminal justice system in Germany.
Konrad N; Völlm B
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 24268458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The insanity defense: effects of abolition unsupported by a moral consensus.
Cobun LS
Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):471-500. PubMed ID: 6486122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. AAPL Practice Guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense.
American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL)
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(4 Suppl):S3-S76. PubMed ID: 25492121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The American Psychiatric Association's resource document on mental retardation and capital sentencing: implementing Atkins v. Virginia.
Bonnie RJ
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 15515919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Ethical problems in forensic-psychiatric assessment].
Barbey I
Psychiatr Prax; 1988 Sep; 15(5):176-81. PubMed ID: 3054984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Forensic psychiatric assessment in the USSR].
Friemert K
Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1988 Nov; 40(11):671-7. PubMed ID: 3237873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The insanity defence: from wild beasts to M'Naghten.
Allnutt S; Samuels A; O'driscoll C
Australas Psychiatry; 2007 Aug; 15(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 17612881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Compliance with psychiatric legal ordinance section 63 STGB. Legal principles--current status--treatment concepts--perspectives].
Nedopil N; Müller-Isberner R
Nervenarzt; 1995 Nov; 66(11):793-801. PubMed ID: 8532095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting restorability of incompetent criminal defendants.
Mossman D
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 17389343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use and reliability of psychiatric diagnosis in forensic settings.
Reid WH; Wise M; Sutton B
Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1992 Sep; 15(3):529-37. PubMed ID: 1409018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature].
Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM
Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
