These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12099317)
21. The comparison of usefulness prosthetic rehabilitation with removable and fixed suprastructures on endosseous implants. Jabłoński D Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2004; 50(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 16871751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Submerged or non-submerged healing of endosseous implants to be used in the rehabilitation of partially dentate patients. Cecchinato D; Olsson C; Lindhe J J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 31(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 15016259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An evaluation of resonance frequency analysis for the determination of the primary stability of orthodontic palatal implants. A study in human cadavers. Gedrange T; Hietschold V; Mai R; Wolf P; Nicklisch M; Harzer W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 16117766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dental implants for orthodontic anchorage. Huang LH; Shotwell JL; Wang HL Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):713-22. PubMed ID: 15953897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Primary loading of palatal implants for orthodontic anchorage--a pilot animal study. Borbély P; Dunay MP; Jung BA; Wehrbein H; Wagner W; Kunkel M J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 36(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 17988886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Anchorage capacity of osseointegrated and conventional anchorage systems: a randomized controlled trial. Feldmann I; Bondemark L Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):339.e19-28. PubMed ID: 18331927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Dental CT and orthodontic implants: imaging technique and assessment of available bone volume in the hard palate. Gahleitner A; Podesser B; Schick S; Watzek G; Imhof H Eur J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 15294334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of skeletal and dental changes between 2-point and 4-point rapid palatal expanders. Lamparski DG; Rinchuse DJ; Close JM; Sciote JJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 12637904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Orthodontic load on short maxillary implants with reduced sink depth: an experimental study. Wehrbein H; Göllner P; Diedrich P Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1063-8. PubMed ID: 18828823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan. Wu TY; Kuang SH; Wu CH J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1595-9. PubMed ID: 19615569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A stent fabricated on a selectively colored stereolithographic model for placement of orthodontic mini-implants. Kitai N; Yasuda Y; Takada K Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(4):264-6. PubMed ID: 12592997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Short epithetic implants for orthodontic anchorage in the paramedian region of the palate. A clinical study. Bernhart T; Freudenthaler J; Dörtbudak O; Bantleon HP; Watzek G Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Dec; 12(6):624-31. PubMed ID: 11737107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. One palatal implant for skeletal anchorage--frequency and range of indications. Krieger E; Yildizhan Z; Wehrbein H Head Face Med; 2015 Apr; 11():15. PubMed ID: 25895493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]