These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12099317)

  • 21. The comparison of usefulness prosthetic rehabilitation with removable and fixed suprastructures on endosseous implants.
    Jabłoński D
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2004; 50(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 16871751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Submerged or non-submerged healing of endosseous implants to be used in the rehabilitation of partially dentate patients.
    Cecchinato D; Olsson C; Lindhe J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 31(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 15016259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An evaluation of resonance frequency analysis for the determination of the primary stability of orthodontic palatal implants. A study in human cadavers.
    Gedrange T; Hietschold V; Mai R; Wolf P; Nicklisch M; Harzer W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 16117766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dental implants for orthodontic anchorage.
    Huang LH; Shotwell JL; Wang HL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):713-22. PubMed ID: 15953897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Primary loading of palatal implants for orthodontic anchorage--a pilot animal study.
    Borbély P; Dunay MP; Jung BA; Wehrbein H; Wagner W; Kunkel M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 36(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 17988886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Anchorage capacity of osseointegrated and conventional anchorage systems: a randomized controlled trial.
    Feldmann I; Bondemark L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):339.e19-28. PubMed ID: 18331927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dental CT and orthodontic implants: imaging technique and assessment of available bone volume in the hard palate.
    Gahleitner A; Podesser B; Schick S; Watzek G; Imhof H
    Eur J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 15294334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of skeletal and dental changes between 2-point and 4-point rapid palatal expanders.
    Lamparski DG; Rinchuse DJ; Close JM; Sciote JJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 12637904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Orthodontic load on short maxillary implants with reduced sink depth: an experimental study.
    Wehrbein H; Göllner P; Diedrich P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1063-8. PubMed ID: 18828823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan.
    Wu TY; Kuang SH; Wu CH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1595-9. PubMed ID: 19615569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A stent fabricated on a selectively colored stereolithographic model for placement of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Kitai N; Yasuda Y; Takada K
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(4):264-6. PubMed ID: 12592997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Short epithetic implants for orthodontic anchorage in the paramedian region of the palate. A clinical study.
    Bernhart T; Freudenthaler J; Dörtbudak O; Bantleon HP; Watzek G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Dec; 12(6):624-31. PubMed ID: 11737107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dental implants as orthodontic anchorage.
    Gallas MM; Abeleira MT; Fernández JR; Burguera M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Feb; 27(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 15743858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Aspects in post-orthodontic removal of Orthosystem implants.
    Nicolas G; Bart VV
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1290-4. PubMed ID: 19040445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Success rate of paramedian palatal implants in adolescent and adult orthodontic patients: a retrospective cohort study.
    Züger J; Pandis N; Wallkamm B; Grossen J; Katsaros C
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Feb; 36(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 23525601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Success rate of second-generation palatal implants.
    Jung BA; Kunkel M; Göllner P; Liechti T; Wehrbein H
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 19123693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of bone conditioning on primary stability of FRIALIT-2 implants.
    Proff P; Bayerlein T; Rottner K; Mai R; Fanghänel J; Gedrange T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 17944963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Three-dimensional evaluation of surgically assisted implant bone-borne rapid maxillary expansion: a pilot study.
    Tausche E; Hansen L; Hietschold V; Lagravère MO; Harzer W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4 Suppl):S92-9. PubMed ID: 17448393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Onplant-supported orthodontic anchorage.
    Armbruster PC; Block MS
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2001 Mar; 9(1):53-74. PubMed ID: 11905337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. One palatal implant for skeletal anchorage--frequency and range of indications.
    Krieger E; Yildizhan Z; Wehrbein H
    Head Face Med; 2015 Apr; 11():15. PubMed ID: 25895493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.