These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12100321)
1. High-resolution carotid artery MRA. Comparison with fast dynamic acquistion and duplex ultrasound scanning. Wikström J; Johansson LO; Rossitti S; Karacagil S; Ahlström H Acta Radiol; 2002 May; 43(3):256-61. PubMed ID: 12100321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High-grade stenoses of the internal carotid artery: comparison of high-resolution contrast enhanced 3D MRA, duplex sonography and power Doppler imaging. Clevert DA; Johnson T; Michaely H; Jung EM; Flach PM; Strautz TI; Clevert DA; Reiser M; Schoenberg SO Eur J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 60(3):379-86. PubMed ID: 16920314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of patient selection strategies for carotid endarterectomy by contrast-enhanced MRA on a 1 T machine and duplex ultrasound in a regional hospital. Korteweg MA; Kerkhoff H; Bakker J; Elgersma OE Clin Radiol; 2008 Feb; 63(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 18194694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MR angiography at 3 Tesla to assess proximal internal carotid artery stenoses: contrast-enhanced or 3D time-of-flight MR angiography? Weber J; Veith P; Jung B; Ihorst G; Moske-Eick O; Meckel S; Urbach H; Taschner CA Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 24384680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy. Back MR; Wilson JS; Rushing G; Stordahl N; Linden C; Johnson BL; Bandyk DF J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):429-38; discussion 439-40. PubMed ID: 10957649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Overestimation of moderate carotid stenosis assessed by both Doppler US and contrast enhanced 3D-MR angiography in the CARMEDAS study. Nonent M; Ben Salem D; Serfaty JM; Buthion V; Pasco-Papon A; Rotaru C; Bressollette L; Papon X; Pachai C; Fortrat JO; Gouny P; Badra A; Berge J; Le Bras Y; Cottier JP; Gauvrit JY; Douek P J Neuroradiol; 2011 Jul; 38(3):148-55. PubMed ID: 20728218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation. Can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography? Patel MR; Kuntz KM; Klufas RA; Kim D; Kramer J; Polak JF; Skillman JJ; Whittemore AD; Edelman RR; Kent KC Stroke; 1995 Oct; 26(10):1753-8. PubMed ID: 7570720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gadolinium-enhanced versus time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography: what is the benefit of contrast enhancement in evaluating carotid stenosis? Muhs BE; Gagne P; Wagener J; Baker J; Ortega MR; Adelman MA; Cayne NS; Rockman CB; Maldonado T Ann Vasc Surg; 2005 Nov; 19(6):823-8. PubMed ID: 16200470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Contrast enhanced MR-angiography (CE-MRA): do contrast media with higher T1 relaxation improve imaging of carotid stenoses?]. Friese S; Krapf H; Fetter M; Vonthein R; Skalej M; Küker W Rofo; 2001 Jun; 173(6):542-6. PubMed ID: 11471296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries using fluoroscopic monitoring of contrast arrival: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability. Butz B; Dorenbeck U; Borisch I; Zorger N; Lenhart M; Feuerbach S; Link J Acta Radiol; 2004 Apr; 45(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 15191100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography. Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Magnetic resonance angiography with contrast media in the study of carotid arteries]. Catalano C; Laghi A; Pediconi F; Fraioli F; Napoli A; Passariello R Radiol Med; 2001; 101(1-2):54-9. PubMed ID: 11360754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the carotid artery at 1.0 Tesla compared to i.a. DSA: is the method suitable for the diagnosis of carotid stenosis?]. Oberholzer K; Kreitner KF; Kalden P; Pitton M; Requardt M; Thelen M Rofo; 2001 Apr; 173(4):350-5. PubMed ID: 11367845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced MRA in ICA-stenosis: is conventional angiography obsolete? Friese S; Krapf H; Fetter M; Klose U; Skalej M; Küker W J Neurol; 2001 Jun; 248(6):506-13. PubMed ID: 11499642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pseudo-occlusions of the internal carotid artery: a rationale for treatment on the basis of a modified carotid duplex scan protocol. Ascher E; Markevich N; Hingorani A; Kallakuri S J Vasc Surg; 2002 Feb; 35(2):340-5. PubMed ID: 11854733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of apparent internal carotid occlusion on ultrasound: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Hammond CJ; McPherson SJ; Patel JV; Gough MJ Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 35(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 18262445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance angiography minimizes need for arteriography after inadequate carotid duplex ultrasound scanning. Back MR; Rogers GA; Wilson JS; Johnson BL; Shames ML; Bandyk DF J Vasc Surg; 2003 Sep; 38(3):422-30; discussion 431. PubMed ID: 12947246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in assessing carotid artery stenosis. D'Onofrio M; Mansueto G; Faccioli N; Guarise A; Tamellini P; Bogina G; Pozzi Mucelli R Radiol Med; 2006 Feb; 111(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 16623309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]