164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12100324)
1. Value of MR imaging in clinical evaluation of breast lesions.
Kristoffersen Wiberg M; Aspelin P; Perbeck L; Boné B
Acta Radiol; 2002 May; 43(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12100324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of scintimammography with 99mTc-sestamibi as a complementary diagnostic technique in the detection of breast cancer.
Danielsson R; Reihnér E; Grabowska A; Boné B
Acta Radiol; 2000 Sep; 41(5):441-5. PubMed ID: 11016763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Benign versus malignant breast disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and Tc-99m tetrofosmin scintimammography.
Fenlon HM; Phelan NC; O'Sullivan P; Tierney S; Gorey T; Ennis JT
Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):214-20. PubMed ID: 9314988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Panizza P; Del Frate C; Soldano F; Isola M; Sardanelli F; Giuseppetti GM; Simonetti G; Lattanzio V; Del Maschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1723-32. PubMed ID: 16714666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast.
Gökalp G; Topal U
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 16316732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative analysis of core needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of palpable and mammographically detected suspicious breast lesions.
Garg S; Mohan H; Bal A; Attri AK; Kochhar S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Nov; 35(11):681-9. PubMed ID: 17924407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of breast diseases].
Boné BK; Szabó B; Palkó A; Aspelin P
Orv Hetil; 2001 Sep; 142(39):2123-31. PubMed ID: 11723831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Diagnostic framework of nonpalpable lesions of the breast].
Ciatto S; Rosselli Del Turco M
Chir Ital; 1995; 47(4):5-8. PubMed ID: 9005133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography and contrast-enhanced MR imaging in 238 histologically verified breast lesions.
Boné B; Péntek Z; Perbeck L; Veress B
Acta Radiol; 1997 Jul; 38(4 Pt 1):489-96. PubMed ID: 9240665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fine needle aspiration cytology in the management of palpable benign and malignant breast disease. Correlation with clinical and mammographic findings.
Langmuir VK; Cramer SF; Hood ME
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 2916375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do mammography, sonography, and MR mammography have a diagnostic benefit compared with mammography and sonography?
Müller-Schimpfle M; Stoll P; Stern W; Kurz S; Dammann F; Claussen CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1323-9. PubMed ID: 9129436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MR imaging of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications: is there any value?
Westerhof JP; Fischer U; Moritz JD; Oestmann JW
Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):675-81. PubMed ID: 9609890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance-guided interventional procedures of the breast: initial experience.
Eliahou R; Sella T; Allweis T; Samet Y; Libson E; Sklair-Levy M
Isr Med Assoc J; 2009 May; 11(5):275-9. PubMed ID: 19637504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Triple approach in the diagnosis of dominant breast masses: combined physical examination, mammography, and fine-needle aspiration.
Kaufman Z; Shpitz B; Shapiro M; Rona R; Lew S; Dinbar A
J Surg Oncol; 1994 Aug; 56(4):254-7. PubMed ID: 8057655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Value of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing breast lesions which need biopsy].
Ling H; Gu YJ; Wang XH; Liu GY; Huang O; Wang LP; Shen KW; Shen ZZ
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 44(15):1036-9. PubMed ID: 17074240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Diagnosis of non-palpable breast lesions: contribution of cytological punctures after stereotaxic localization].
Meunier M; Le Gal M; Klijanienko J; Vielh P; Neuenschwander S; Durand JC; Asselain B
J Radiol; 1995 May; 76(5):259-62. PubMed ID: 7783038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy.
Orel SG; Schnall MD; Powell CM; Hochman MG; Solin LJ; Fowble BL; Torosian MH; Rosato EF
Radiology; 1995 Jul; 196(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 7784554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcome of men presenting with clinical breast problems: the role of mammography and ultrasound.
Patterson SK; Helvie MA; Aziz K; Nees AV
Breast J; 2006; 12(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 16958958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup.
Buchberger W; DeKoekkoek-Doll P; Springer P; Obrist P; Dünser M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Oct; 173(4):921-7. PubMed ID: 10511149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
