274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12101114)
1. Reliability in the classification of advanced colorectal adenomas.
Terry MB; Neugut AI; Bostick RM; Potter JD; Haile RW; Fenoglio-Preiser CM
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2002 Jul; 11(7):660-3. PubMed ID: 12101114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk factors for advanced colorectal adenomas: a pooled analysis.
Terry MB; Neugut AI; Bostick RM; Sandler RS; Haile RW; Jacobson JS; Fenoglio-Preiser CM; Potter JD
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2002 Jul; 11(7):622-9. PubMed ID: 12101109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter-observer variation in the histological diagnosis of polyps in colorectal cancer screening.
van Putten PG; Hol L; van Dekken H; Han van Krieken J; van Ballegooijen M; Kuipers EJ; van Leerdam ME
Histopathology; 2011 May; 58(6):974-81. PubMed ID: 21585430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproducibility of the villous component and high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas <1 cm: implications for endoscopic surveillance.
Mahajan D; Downs-Kelly E; Liu X; Pai RK; Patil DT; Rybicki L; Bennett AE; Plesec T; Cummings O; Rex D; Goldblum JR
Am J Surg Pathol; 2013 Mar; 37(3):427-33. PubMed ID: 23348206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Vienna classification applied to colorectal adenomas.
Rubio CA; Nesi G; Messerini L; Zampi GC; Mandai K; Itabashi M; Takubo K
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Nov; 21(11):1697-703. PubMed ID: 16984592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Poor interobserver agreement in the distinction of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in pretreatment Barrett's esophagus biopsies.
Downs-Kelly E; Mendelin JE; Bennett AE; Castilla E; Henricks WH; Schoenfield L; Skacel M; Yerian L; Rice TW; Rybicki LA; Bronner MP; Goldblum JR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Sep; 103(9):2333-40; quiz 2341. PubMed ID: 18671819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett esophagus: a reaffirmation.
Montgomery E; Bronner MP; Goldblum JR; Greenson JK; Haber MM; Hart J; Lamps LW; Lauwers GY; Lazenby AJ; Lewin DN; Robert ME; Toledano AY; Shyr Y; Washington K
Hum Pathol; 2001 Apr; 32(4):368-78. PubMed ID: 11331953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Observer variability in the assessment of type and dysplasia of colorectal adenomas, analyzed using kappa statistics.
Jensen P; Krogsgaard MR; Christiansen J; Braendstrup O; Johansen A; Olsen J
Dis Colon Rectum; 1995 Feb; 38(2):195-8. PubMed ID: 7851176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Inter-observer agreement on histological diagnosis of colorectal polyps: the APACC study].
Yoon H; Martin A; Benamouzig R; Longchampt E; Deyra J; Chaussade S;
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2002 Mar; 26(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 11981461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Classification of colorectal adenomas with quantitative pathology. Evaluation of morphometry, stereology, mitotic counts and syntactic structure analysis.
Meijer GA; Meuwissen SG; Baak JP
Anal Cell Pathol; 1995 Dec; 9(4):311-23. PubMed ID: 8616106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characteristics of metachronous colorectal adenomas found during long-term follow-up: analysis of four subsequent generations of adenoma recurrence.
Nusko G; Hahn EG; Mansmann U
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2009; 44(6):736-44. PubMed ID: 19277927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Follow-up of a cohort of 2604 colorectal adenomas treated in 1991 and 1992. Search for parameters related to adenomatous recurrence].
Le Bodic L; Cerbelaud C; Bouchand S; Auffret N; Clément A; Le Bodic MF
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2003 May; 27(5):466-70. PubMed ID: 12843910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histological assessment of colorectal adenomas by size. Are polyps less than 10 mm in size clinically important?
Aldridge AJ; Simson JN
Eur J Surg; 2001 Oct; 167(10):777-81. PubMed ID: 11775731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the clinicopathologic features between flat and polypoid adenoma.
Kil Lee S; Il Kim T; Kwan Shin S; Ho Kim W; Kim H; Kyu Kim N
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2008; 43(9):1116-21. PubMed ID: 18609172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of malignant potential between serrated adenomas and traditional adenomas.
Song SY; Kim YH; Yu MK; Kim JH; Lee JM; Son HJ; Rhee PL; Kim JJ; Paik SW; Rhee JC
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Nov; 22(11):1786-90. PubMed ID: 17914951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Large size, villous content and distal location are associated with severe dysplasia in colorectal adenomas.
Giuliani A; Caporale A; Corona M; Ricciardulli T; Di Bari M; Demoro M; Scarpini M; Angelico F
Anticancer Res; 2006; 26(5B):3717-22. PubMed ID: 17094390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An assessment of the reliability of the Enneking and Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini classifications for staging of primary spinal tumors by the Spine Oncology Study Group.
Chan P; Boriani S; Fourney DR; Biagini R; Dekutoski MB; Fehlings MG; Ryken TC; Gokaslan ZL; Vrionis FD; Harrop JS; Schmidt MH; Vialle LR; Gerszten PC; Rhines LD; Ondra SL; Pratt SR; Fisher CG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(4):384-91. PubMed ID: 19214098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Difference in cell proliferation between two structurally different lesions in colorectal adenomas: high-grade dysplasia and carcinoma in situ.
Rubio CA
Anticancer Res; 2007; 27(6C):4321-4. PubMed ID: 18214039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk factors for advanced adenomas amongst small and diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective monocenter study.
Chaput U; Alberto SF; Terris B; Beuvon F; Audureau E; Coriat R; Roche H; Gaudric M; Prat F; Chaussade S
Dig Liver Dis; 2011 Aug; 43(8):609-12. PubMed ID: 21764012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biopsy of colorectal polyps is not adequate for grading of neoplasia.
Gondal G; Grotmol T; Hofstad B; Bretthauer M; Eide TJ; Hoff G
Endoscopy; 2005 Dec; 37(12):1193-7. PubMed ID: 16329016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
