BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12101855)

  • 1. Repeated severe neonatal hemolysis due to Rhesus isoimmunization in a pregnant woman.
    Chen DC; Chang YK; Chen WH; Liu JY
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2002 May; 101(5):359-61. PubMed ID: 12101855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Prevention of fetomaternal rhesus-D allo-immunization. Practical aspects].
    Cortey A; Brossard Y
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2006 Feb; 35(1 Suppl):1S123-1S130. PubMed ID: 16495838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Adverse effects and patient information].
    Cortey A; Brossard Y
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2006 Feb; 35(1 Suppl):1S112-1S118. PubMed ID: 16495836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Epidemiology of anti-D allo-immunization during pregnancy].
    Branger B; Winer N
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2006 Feb; 35(1 Suppl):1S87-1S92. PubMed ID: 16495833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A curious case of anti-D antibody titer.
    Hensley JG; Coughlin KP; Klein LL
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2009; 54(6):497-502. PubMed ID: 19879523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An increased risk for non allo-immunization related intrauterine fetal death in RhD-negative patients.
    Ben-David G; Sheiner E; Levy A; Erez O; Mazor M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2008 Apr; 21(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 18330822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Costs and benefits of non-invasive fetal RhD determination.
    Teitelbaum L; Metcalfe A; Clarke G; Parboosingh JS; Wilson RD; Johnson JM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 45(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 25380024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The importance of antenatal immunoprophylaxis for prevention of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn].
    Starcević M; Mataija M; Sović D; Dodig J; Matijević R; Kukuruzović M
    Acta Med Croatica; 2011 Mar; 65(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21568074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fetal RhD genotyping: a more efficient use of anti-D immunoglobulin.
    Daniels G; Finning K; Martin P; Summers J
    Transfus Clin Biol; 2007 Dec; 14(6):568-71. PubMed ID: 18436463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The economics of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for pregnant women who are rhesus negative.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Lloyd Jones M; Wight J; Forman K; Wray J; Beverley C
    BJOG; 2004 Sep; 111(9):903-7. PubMed ID: 15327602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Anti-D titers in RhD-negative pregnant women on fetuses and newborns: A retrospective study.
    Tang TH; Guo CY; Li XY; Hu YX; Liu WK; Yu MX
    Pediatr Neonatol; 2024 May; 65(3):288-292. PubMed ID: 37957047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anti-D in a mother, hemizygous for the variant RHD*DNB gene, associated with hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.
    Quantock KM; Lopez GH; Hyland CA; Liew YW; Flower RL; Niemann FJ; Joyce A
    Transfusion; 2017 Aug; 57(8):1938-1943. PubMed ID: 28639307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Expanded rhesus prophylaxis].
    Maroni ES
    Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1987 Nov; 76(45):1254-9. PubMed ID: 2827286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Postnatal outcome in neonates with severe Rhesus c compared to rhesus D hemolytic disease.
    Rath ME; Smits-Wintjens VE; Lindenburg IT; Folman CC; Brand A; van Kamp IL; Oepkes D; Walther FJ; Lopriore E
    Transfusion; 2013 Jul; 53(7):1580-5. PubMed ID: 23113703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic laboratory technologies for the fetus and neonate with isoimmunization.
    Geaghan SM
    Semin Perinatol; 2011 Jun; 35(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 21641488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Following targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis, almost half of the pregnant women had undetectable anti-D prophylaxis at delivery.
    Sørensen K; Stjern HE; Karlsen BAG; Tomter G; Ystad I; Herud I; Baevre MS; Llohn AH; Akkök ÇA
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Apr; 101(4):431-440. PubMed ID: 35224728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Antenatal prophylaxis of Rh isoimmunization: 28-weeks'-gestation service program.
    Bowman JM; Pollock JM
    Can Med Assoc J; 1978 Mar; 118(6):627-30. PubMed ID: 77715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Successful emergency treatment of a case with severe hemolytic disease of the newborn due to maternal Rh deletion phenotype-D].
    Liu KL; Li BJ; Peng JY
    Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Jun; 44(6):473-4. PubMed ID: 16836866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Prevention of fetomaternal rhesus-D allo-immunization. Perspectives].
    Cortey A; Brossard Y; Beliard R; Bourel D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2006 Feb; 35(1 Suppl):1S119-1S122. PubMed ID: 16495837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Foetal Rhesus-D typing added to antenatal screening for infectious diseases and erythrocyte immunisation].
    van der Ploeg CP; Hirschberg HJ; de Haas M; Abbink F
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2015; 159():A8315. PubMed ID: 25898866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.