566 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12102135)
1. Concurrent reinforcement schedules: behavior change and maintenance without extinction.
Hoch H; McComas JJ; Thompson AL; Paone D
J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 12102135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
Kodak T; Lerman DC; Volkert VM; Trosclair N
J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 17471792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Choices between positive and negative reinforcement during treatment for escape-maintained behavior.
DeLeon IG; Neidert PL; Anders BM; Rodriguez-Catter V
J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):521-5. PubMed ID: 11800194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preference for reinforcers under progressive- and fixed-ratio schedules: a comparison of single and concurrent arrangements.
Glover AC; Roane HS; Kadey HJ; Grow LL
J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):163-76. PubMed ID: 18595281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reducing escape behavior and increasing task completion with functional communication training, extinction, and response chaining.
Lalli JS; Casey S; Kates K
J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 7592143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Responding maintained by intermittent reinforcement: implications for the use of extinction with problem behavior in clinical settings.
Lerman DC; Iwata BA; Shore BA; Kahng SW
J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):153-71. PubMed ID: 8682734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noncontingent reinforcement: a further examination of schedule effects during treatment.
Wallace MD; Iwata BA; Hanley GP; Thompson RH; Roscoe EM
J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 23322927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Brief report: Signals enhance the suppressive effects of noncontingent reinforcement.
Ringdahl JE; Call NA; Christensen T; Boelter EW
J Autism Dev Disord; 2010 Mar; 40(3):378-82. PubMed ID: 19777331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of noncontingent access to food on the rate of object mouthing across three settings.
Roane HS; Kelly ML; Fisher WW
J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(4):579-82. PubMed ID: 14768675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of the reinforcement and extinction components in DRO contingencies with self-injury.
Mazaleski JL; Iwata BA; Vollmer TR; Zarcone JR; Smith RG
J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 8331012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the establishing and reinforcing effects of termination of demands for destructive behavior maintained by positive and negative reinforcement.
Piazza CC; Hanley GP; Fisher WW; Ruyter JM; Gulotta CS
Res Dev Disabil; 1998; 19(5):395-407. PubMed ID: 9770252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variable-time reinforcement schedules in the treatment of socially maintained problem behavior.
Van Camp CM; Lerman DC; Kelley ME; Contrucci SA; Vorndran CM
J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):545-57. PubMed ID: 11214030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reduction of aggression evoked by sounds using noncontingent reinforcement and time-out.
Dupuis DL; Lerman DC; Tsami L; Shireman ML
J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):669-74. PubMed ID: 26118940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Self-control in children with autism: response allocation during delays to reinforcement.
Dixon MR; Cummings A
J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):491-5. PubMed ID: 11800188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A component analysis of schedule thinning during functional communication training.
Betz AM; Fisher WW; Roane HS; Mintz JC; Owen TM
J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(1):219-41. PubMed ID: 24114096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Manipulating antecedent conditions to alter the stimulus control of problem behavior.
Kennedy CH
J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(1):161-70. PubMed ID: 8188556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stimulus (instructional) fading during extinction of self-injurious escape behavior.
Pace GM; Iwata BA; Cowdery GE; Andree PJ; McIntyre T
J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 8331017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of positive and negative reinforcement for compliance to treat problem behavior maintained by escape.
Slocum SK; Vollmer TR
J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):563-74. PubMed ID: 25969379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An investigation of differential reinforcement of alternative behavior without extinction.
Athens ES; Vollmer TR
J Appl Behav Anal; 2010; 43(4):569-89. PubMed ID: 21541145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Too much reinforcement, too little behavior: assessing task interspersal procedures in conjunction with different reinforcement schedules with autistic children.
Charlop MH; Kurtz PF; Milstein JP
J Appl Behav Anal; 1992; 25(4):795-808. PubMed ID: 1478903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
